Skyware, Inc v. Abramson et al

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ADJUST BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS' PENDING MOTIONS re 30 Stipulation filed by Skyware, Inc. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on June 3, 2011. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2011)

Case5:11-cv-00545-PSG Document30

Filed06/03/11 Page1 of 4

TED C. LINDQUIST, III (Cal. Bar No. 178523)
1 LINDQUISTLAW
100 Pine Street, Suite 2150
2 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
3 Facsimile: 866-255-4580
Email: [e-mail]
4
Attorneys for Plaintiff
5 SKYWARE, INC.
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION

10
11
SKYWARE, INC., a Delaware
12 corporation,
13
14

Case No. 5:11-CV-00545-PSG

Plaintiff,
v.

15 NORMAN ABRAMSON, an individual;
JOAN ABRAMSON, an individual;
16 DAVID CADITZ, an individual; LEM
ROGER SOLES, an individual; SHU HUI
17 CHEN, an individual; and DOES 1 through
25, inclusive,
18
Defendants.
19

STIPULATION ADJUSTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
DEFENDANTS’ PENDING MOTIONS
[DOCKET NOS. 11, 13, 19]

20
21
22

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties’

23 undersigned counsel, pursuant to Civ. L.R. 6-2, and other applicable law, as follows:
24
25

RECITALS
A.

Defendants Norman Abramson and Lem Roger Soles filed separate

26 Motions to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Proceedings [Docket Nos. 11, 19], and
27 defendants Joan Abramson and David Caditz filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s
28

-1Case No. 5:11-cv-00545-PSG

STIPULATION ADJUSTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
ON DEFENDANTS’ PENDING MOTIONS

Case5:11-cv-00545-PSG Document30

Filed06/03/11 Page2 of 4

1 Complaint [Docket No. 13]. The hearing date for all three motions is currently scheduled
2 for June 21, 2011;
3

B.

Based upon the June 21 hearing date, the Plaintiff’s opposition briefs

4 were due on May 31, 2011;
5

C.

Due to an urgent personal family matter, counsel for Plaintiff was

6 required to be out of town and was unable to attend to the filing of the Plaintiff’s
7 opposition briefs on the normal statutory briefing schedule;
8

D.

Subject to the Court’s approval, the parties agree to adjust the briefing

9 schedule such that the Plaintiff’s opposition briefs will be filed on June 7, 2011, and the
10 Defendants’ reply briefs will be filed on June 14, 2011.
11
12

STIPULATION
1.

The parties respectfully request that the Court modify the briefing

13 schedule on the Defendants’ pending motions scheduled for hearing on June 21, 2011, as
14 follows: Plaintiff’s opposition briefs shall be filed by June 7, 2011, and Defendants reply
15 briefs shall be filed by June 14, 2011.
16
17 SO STIPULATED:
18
19

DATED: June 2, 2011
LINDQUISTLAW

20
21

By

22

/s/ TED C. LINDQUIST, III
TED C. LINDQUIST, III

23

Attorneys for Plaintiff
SKYWARE, INC.

24
25
26
27
28

-2CASE NO. 5:11-CV-00545-PSG

STIPULATION ADJUSTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
ON DEFENDANTS’ PENDING MOTIONS

Case5:11-cv-00545-PSG Document30

1

Filed06/03/11 Page3 of 4

DATED: June 2, 2011

2

COMPUTERLAW GROUP LLP

3
4

By

5
6

/s/ JACK RUSSO
JACK RUSSO
Attorneys for Defendants
NORMAN ABRAMSON, JOAN ABRAMSON,
AND DAVID CADITZ

7
8
9
10 DATED: June 2, 2011

DHILLON & SMITH LLP

11
12

By

13

/s/ HARMEET K. DHILLON
HARMEET K. DHILLON

14

Attorneys for Defendant
SHU HUI CHEN

15
16
17 DATED: June 2, 2011
18
By:

19

/s/ LEM ROGER SOLES

LEM ROGER SOLES

20

Defendant, Pro Se

21
22
23 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
24
3
Dated: June __, 2011

25
HON. PAUL S. GREWAL

26
27
28

-3CASE NO. 5:11-CV-00545-PSG

STIPULATION ADJUSTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
ON DEFENDANTS’ PENDING MOTIONS

Case5:11-cv-00545-PSG Document30

CERTIFICATION

1
2

Filed06/03/11 Page4 of 4

I, Ted C. Lindquist, III, am the ECF User whose identification and password

3 are being used to file this Stipulation Adjusting Briefing Schedule On Defendants’ Pending
4 Motions [Docket Nos. 11, 13, 19]. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B., I hereby
5 attest that Jack Russo, counsel for Defendant Norman Abramson, Joan Abramson and
6 David Caditz; Harmeet Dhillon, counsel for Defendant Shu Hui Chen; and Defendant Lem
7 Roger Soles, Pro Se, each has concurred in this filing.
8
9

DATED: June 2, 2011
LINDQUISTLAW

10
11

By

12

/s/ TED C. LINDQUIST, III
TED C. LINDQUIST, III

13

Attorneys for Plaintiff
SKYWARE, INC.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-4CASE NO. 5:11-CV-00545-PSG

STIPULATION ADJUSTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
ON DEFENDANTS’ PENDING MOTIONS