Solannex, Inc. v. Nanosolar, Inc.
Filing
42
STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Referral Selecting Private ADR re 40 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/20/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2011)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Solannex, Inc.
CASE NO. 11-cv-00547 EJD
Plaintiff(s),
v.
Nanosolar, Inc.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
JAMS - Silicon Valley
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
✔
Mediation
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
9
✔
December 9, 2011
other requested deadline _____________________________________________
10/19/2011
Dated:___________
Case L. Collard
____________________________
Attorney for Plaintiff
10/19/2011
Dated:____________
Peter Gratzinger
____________________________
Attorney for Defendant
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:
9
Non-binding Arbitration
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
9
Mediation
9
Private ADR
✔
Deadline for ADR session
9
90 days from the date of this order.
9
other ___________________
December 9, 2011
✔
IT IS SO ORDERED.
October 20, 2011
Dated:________________
___________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DISTRICT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?