Solannex, Inc. v. Nanosolar, Inc.

Filing 42

STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Referral Selecting Private ADR re 40 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/20/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2011)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Solannex, Inc. CASE NO. 11-cv-00547 EJD Plaintiff(s), v. Nanosolar, Inc. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: 9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: JAMS - Silicon Valley 9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ ✔ Mediation _____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 9 ✔ December 9, 2011 other requested deadline _____________________________________________ 10/19/2011 Dated:___________ Case L. Collard ____________________________ Attorney for Plaintiff 10/19/2011 Dated:____________ Peter Gratzinger ____________________________ Attorney for Defendant [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 9 Non-binding Arbitration 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) 9 Mediation 9 Private ADR ✔ Deadline for ADR session 9 90 days from the date of this order. 9 other ___________________ December 9, 2011 ✔ IT IS SO ORDERED. October 20, 2011 Dated:________________ ___________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DISTRICT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?