Solannex, Inc. v. Nanosolar, Inc.
Filing
46
STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO Change Time to Hold ADR Session re 44 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/12/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2012)
1 GREGORY S. TAMKIN (State Bar No. 175009) GREGORY P. STONE (State Bar No. 78329)
2
3
4
5
6
CASE COLLARD (State Bar No. 245834)
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
1400 Wewatta Street, Suite 400
Denver, CO 80202-5549
Telephone: (303) 629-3400
Facsimile: (303) 629-3450
Email: tamkin.greg@dorsey.com
Email: collard.case@dorsey.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff Solannex, Inc.
Email: Gregory.Stone@mto.com
PETER E. GRATZINGER (State Bar No. 228764)
Email: Peter.Gratzinger@mto.com
ADAM R. LAWTON (State Bar No. 252546)
Email: Adam.Lawton@mto.com
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
355 South Grand Avenue, Thirty-Fifth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
Telephone: (213) 683-9100
Facsimile: (213) 687-3702
Attorneys for Defendant Nanosolar, Inc.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11 SOLANNEX, INC.,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
NANOSOLAR, INC.,
15
16
Defendant.
Case No. 11-cv-00547 EJD
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
CHANGING TIME TO HOLD ADR
SESSION
Honorable Judge Edward J. Davila
17
18
Pursuant to the October 20, 2011, Stipulation and Order Selecting ADR Process (ECF
19 No. 42), the parties agreed to hold an ADR session by December 9, 2011. Plaintiff Solannex, Inc.
20 (“Solannex”) and Defendant Nanosolar, Inc. (“Nanosolar”) hereby submit this stipulated request for
21 an order extending until December 14, 2011, the date for the parties to hold the ADR session, and
22 in support thereof state as follows.
23
The parties have jointly scheduled an ADR session with the JAMS Silicon Valley
24 Resolution Center in San Jose, California, but were not able to schedule the session until
25 December 14, 2011. Solannex and Nanosolar therefore herby stipulate that the Stipulation and
26 Order Selecting ADR Process be amended to state that the parties agree to hold the ADR session by
27 December 14, 2011.
28
No other changes are required in the ADR process or the schedule in this case.
1
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME TO HOLD ADR SESSION
Case No. 11-cv-00547 EJD
1
I, Gregory S. Tamkin, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been
2 obtained from the other signatory below.
3 Dated this 2nd day of December, 2011.
4
/s/ Gregory S. Tamkin
/s/ Peter E. Gratzinger
Gregory P. Stone
Email: Gregory.Stone@mto.com
Peter E. Gratzinger
Email: Peter.Gratzinger@mto.com
Adam R. Lawton
Email: Adam.Lawton@mto.com
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
355 South Grand Avenue, Thirty-Fifth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
Telephone: (213) 683-9100
Facsimile: (213) 687-3702
Attorneys for Defendant Nanosolar, Inc.
5 Gregory S. Tamkin
Case Collard
6 DORSEY & WHITNEY, LLP
7 Email: tamkin.greg@dorsey.com
Email: collard.case@dorsey.com
8 1400 Wewatta Street, Suite 400
Denver, CO 80202-5549
9 Telephone: (303) 629-3400
Facsimile: (303) 629-3450
10 Attorneys for Plaintiff Solannex, Inc.
11
12
13 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
January 12, 2012
14 Dated: December ____, 2011
15
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME TO HOLD ADR SESSION
Case No. 11-cv-00547 EJD
1
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
On December 2, 2011, I caused the foregoing document, titled STIPULATED REQUEST
3 FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME TO HOLD ADR SESSION, to be electronically filed with the
4 court, which will cause a Notice of Electronic Filing to be automatically generated by the court’s
5 electronic filing system and sent to all parties in this case. Pursuant to General Order No. 45,
6 Sections II.G. and IX, the Notice of Electronic Filing when e-mailed to the email addresses of
7 record for counsel in the case constitutes service on the receiving parties.
8
/s/ Gregory S. Tamkin
Gregory S. Tamkin
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME TO HOLD ADR SESSION
Case No. 11-cv-00547 EJD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?