Soria Eduardo & Socorro et al v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC

Filing 21

ORDER Continuing Hearing Date and CMC to June 16, 2011 re 20 . Case Management Statement due by 6/9/2011. Case Management Conference set for 6/16/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose. Motion Hearing set for 6/16/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Lucy H. Koh. Signed by Judge Koh on 3/25/11. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2011)

Download PDF
Soria Eduardo & Socorro et al v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC Doc. 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 KENNETH R. GRAHAM, SB #216733 Law Offices of Kenneth R. Graham 1575 Treat Blvd., Suite 105 Walnut Creek, CA 94598 Phone: (925) 932-0170 Fax: (925) 932-3940 Email: kg@elaws.com Attorney for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: CV 11-00584 LHK SORIA, EDUARDO & SOCORRO, individual(s), PLAINTIFFS, JOINT STIPULATION CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANT AURORA'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT Current Hearing Date: April 28th, 2011 Time: 1:30 PM Courtroom: 4. 5th floor Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh vs. AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC, a California Corporation, QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORP.; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, DEFENDANT(S). WHEREAS defendant Aurora Loan Services LLC, ("Aurora") has filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint, currently set for hearing on April 28th, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. in courtroom 4 of the above-entitled court, located at 280 South 1st Street, San Jose, California 95133, the Honorable Lucy H. Koh, United States District Court Judge presiding. WHEREAS plaintiffs Eduardo and Socorro Soria, by and through their counsel, have requested a continuance of the hearings on Aurora's motion to allow plaintiffs additional time to explore a loan modification settlement with Aurora and to prepare opposition to the pending motions. WHEREFORE, the parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to continue the hearing on Aurora's motions for an extension of at least 30 days. The parties ask that a new Request to Continue Hearing on Defendant Aurora's Motion to Dismiss Complaint; Proposed Order 1 CV 11-00584 LHK Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 hearing be set to a date convenient for the Court, but no earlier than May 31st, 2011. The time to file any opposition and reply briefs shall be based on the continued hearing date. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: March 23, 2011 Respectfully, Law Offices of Kenneth R. Graham By: /s/ Kenneth R. Graham KENNETH R. GRAHAM Attorney for Plaintiffs Eduardo and Socorro Soria Dated: March 23, 2011 Respectfully, Wright, Finlay and Zak, LLP. By: /s/ Lukasz I. Wozniak LUKASZ I. WOZNIAK Attorney for Defendant Aurora Loan Services, LLC Request to Continue Hearing on Defendant Aurora's Motion to Dismiss Complaint; Proposed Order 2 CV 11-00584 LHK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 March 25, 2011 DATED: __________________ IT IS SO ORDERED. [PROPOSED] ORDER The Court having read the parties' Request to Continue the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Hearing for Defendant Aurora's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint is rescheduled to: a. Date: June 16, 2011 b. Time: 1:30 p.m. c. Place: Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose Courthouse d. To be followed by a Case Management Conference, with a Joint Case Management Statement due June 9, 2011 Requests for further continuances will be disfavored. By:_______________________________ JUDGE OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Request to Continue Hearing on Defendant Aurora's Motion to Dismiss Complaint; Proposed Order 3 CV 11-00584 LHK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?