Symantec Corporation v. Comodo Group, Inc

Filing 16

STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Request to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint re 15 Stipulation filed by Symantec Corporation. Response due 8/8/2011. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/28/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2011)

Download PDF
S 7 8 ER H Attorneys for Plaintiff SYMANTEC CORPORATION J . D av i l a R NIA w a rd J u d ge E d FO RT 6 NO 5 LI 4 ERED O ORD IT IS S A 3 UNIT ED 2 JEDEDIAH WAKEFIELD (CSB NO. 178058) jwakefield@fenwick.com GUINEVERE L. JOBSON (CSB NO. 251907) gjobson@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 875-2300 Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 RT U O 1 ISTRIC ES D TC T TA N C F D IS T IC T O R 7/28/20111 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 SAN FRANCISCO ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 SYMANTEC CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Case No. 5:11-cv-00760-EJD 13 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 16 COMODO GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 Pursuant to Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiff Symantec 21 Corporation (“Symantec”) and Defendant Comodo Group, Inc. (“Comodo”), hereby stipulate that 22 the time for Comodo to answer or otherwise respond to Symantec’s Complaint is extended to 23 August 8, 2011. This extension will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by 24 Court order. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 1 CASE NO. 5:11-CV-00760-EJD 1 2 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: July 27, 2011 FENWICK & WEST LLP 3 4 By: /s/ Jedediah Wakefield Jedediah Wakefield 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff SYMANTEC CORPORATION 6 7 8 Dated: July 27, 2011 9 10 BY: /s/ Stephen Cannavale Stephen Cannavale 11 Counsel for Defendant COMODO GROUP, INC. SAN FRANCISCO ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 ATTORNEY ATTESTATION 13 14 I hereby attest, pursuant to General Order 45, § X.B, that that concurrence in the filing of 15 this document has been obtained from the signatory indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) 16 within this e-filed document. 17 /s/ Jedediah Wakefield Jedediah Wakefield 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 2 CASE NO. 5:11-CV-00760-EJD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?