Symantec Corporation v. Comodo Group, Inc

Filing 18

STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Extending Time to Respond to Complaint re 17 Stipulation. The time for Comodo to answer or otherwise respond to Symantec's Complaint is extended to September 14, 2011. This extension will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/6/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2011)

7
8

R NIA

a

LI

ER

J . D av i l

FO

S

Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYMANTEC CORPORATION

d w a rd
J u d ge E

H

6

RT

5

I

NO

4

ERED

ORD
T IS SO

A

3

UNIT
ED

2

JEDEDIAH WAKEFIELD (CSB NO. 178058)
[e-mail]
GUINEVERE L. JOBSON (CSB NO. 251907)
[e-mail]
FENWICK & WEST LLP
555 California Street, 12th Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

RT
U
O

1

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11

SAN FRANCISCO

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

12
13

SYMANTEC CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation,

16

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME
TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Plaintiff,

14
15

Case No. 5:11-cv-00760-EJD

v.
COMODO GROUP, INC., a Delaware
corporation,

17

Defendant.

18
19
20

Pursuant to Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiff Symantec

21

Corporation (“Symantec”) and Defendant Comodo Group, Inc. (“Comodo”), hereby stipulate that

22

the time for Comodo to answer or otherwise respond to Symantec’s Complaint is extended to

23

September 14, 2011. This extension will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed

24

by Court order.

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME
TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1

CASE NO. 5:11-CV-00760-EJD

1
2

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: August 30, 2011

FENWICK & WEST LLP

3
4

By: /s/ Jedediah Wakefield
Jedediah Wakefield

5

Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYMANTEC CORPORATION

6
7
8

Dated: August 30, 2011

9
10

BY: /s/ Stephen Cannavale
Stephen Cannavale

11

Counsel for Defendant
COMODO GROUP, INC.

SAN FRANCISCO

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

12
ATTORNEY ATTESTATION

13
14

I hereby attest, pursuant to General Order 45, § X.B, that that concurrence in the filing of

15

this document has been obtained from the signatory indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/)

16

within this e-filed document.

17

/s/ Jedediah Wakefield
Jedediah Wakefield

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME
TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

2

CASE NO. 5:11-CV-00760-EJD