TEK Global S.R.L. et.al. v. Sealant Systems International Inc. et.al.
Filing
169
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE OR TESTIMONY RELATING TO TEK'S CONSTRUCTIONS OF CLAIM LANGUAGE THAT CONFLICT WITH THE COURT'S CONSTRUCTIONS, granting 165 . Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 3/29/2013. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP
STANLEY M. GIBSON (Bar No. 162329), sgibson@jmbm.com
GREGORY S. CORDREY (Bar No. 190144), gcordrey@jmbm.com
ANDREW I. SHADOFF (Bar No. 272319), ashadoff@jmbm.com
1900 Avenue of the Stars, Seventh Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: (310) 203-8080
Facsimile: (310) 203-0567
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
SEALANT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL INC.
ACCESSORIES MARKETING, INC.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
SEALANT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL,
INC., and ACCESSORIES MARKETING,
INC.,
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiffs,
v.
TEK GLOBAL S.R.L. and TEK
CORPORATION,
CASE NO.
11-cv-774-PSG (Lead case)
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE JOINT
STIPULATION TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE
OR TESTIMONY RELATING TO TEK'S
CONSTRUCTIONS OF CLAIM
LANGUAGE THAT CONFLICT WITH THE
COURT'S CONSTRUCTIONS
[Joint Stipulation filed concurrently herewith]
Defendants.
19
Final Pretrial
Conference Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:
20
(Consolidated with Case No. 11-cv-1649)
18
April 2, 2013
10:00 a.m.
5, 4th Floor
Hon. Paul S. Grewal
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PRINTED ON
29
RECYCLED PAPER
LA 9382442v1
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
Case No. 11-cv-774-PSG
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
The Court, having reviewed the Joint Stipulation to Preclude Evidence or Testimony
3
Relating to TEK's Construction of Claim Language That Conflicts with the Court's Construction
4
filed by Plaintiff Accessories Marketing, Inc. ("AMI"), and Defendant TEK Corporation ("TEK"),
5
and good cause appearing therefor, hereby ORDERS that:
6
1.
TEK may not introduce evidence or testimony, including the testimony of Dr.
7
Homayoon Kazerooni, relating to or based on claim constructions that differ from the Court's claim
8
constructions.
9
2.
TEK may not introduce evidence or testimony relating to or based on the
10
construction of the terms "opposite substantially the same opening" or "opening substantially
11
opposes" as those terms appear in AMI's U.S. Patent No. 6,789,581, that are different from the
12
Court's construction of these claim terms.
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
March 29
Dated: _______________, 2013
______________________________
Hon. Paul Singh Grewal
United States District Court
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PRINTED ON
29
RECYCLED PAPER
LA 9382442v1
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER RE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
Case No. 11-cv-774-PSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?