TEK Global S.R.L. et.al. v. Sealant Systems International Inc. et.al.
Filing
56
STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR ORDER AMENDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER re 55 Stipulation filed by TEK Corporation, TEK Global, S.R.L. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on December 16, 2011. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
DUANE H. MATHIOWETZ, SBN 111831
50 Fremont Street
Post Office Box 7880
San Francisco, CA 94120-7880
Telephone: (415) 983-1000
Facsimile: (415) 983-1200
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
NEIL VOHRA, SBN 270256
725 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2800
Los Angeles, CA 90017-5406
Telephone: (213) 488-7100
Facsimile: (213) 629-1033
8
9
Attorneys for Defendants
TEK GLOBAL S.R.L and
TEK CORPORATION
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN JOSE DIVISION
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
)
SEALANT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, )
INC. AND ACCESSORIES MARKETING, )
INC.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
TEK GLOBAL S.R.L. and TEK
)
CORPORATION,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
Case No. CV 11-0774-PSG (Lead case)
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
ORDER AMENDING CASE
MANAGEMENT ORDER, AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
(CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE
NO. CV 11-1649)
Hon. Paul S. Grewal
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
403229266v1
Case No. CV 11-0774-PSG
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
AMENDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
1
Counsel for TEK Global and TEK Corporation ("TEK") and Sealant Systems
2
International and Automotive Marketing Inc. ("SSI") have conferred and hereby jointly
3
request the Court to modify certain dates set forth in its Case Management Order [Docket
4
No. 24], as follows:
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Patent LR 4-2 Exchange of Proposed Claim Terms, to be changed from December
9, 2011 to January 23, 2012.
Patent LR 4-3 Exchange Prelim. Claim & Extrinsic Evidence, to be changed from
January 12, 2012 to February 20, 2012.
Claim Constr. Discovery Cut-off, to be changed from February 12, 2012 to March
12, 2012.
The parties jointly request these changes to allow the parties to facilitate settlement
12
negotiations during January and/or February 2012, prior to incurring significant fees
13
relating to claim construction.
14
15
16
17
18
There have been no previous modifications of the dates set by the Court in its Case
Management Order.
The proposed changes will have no anticipated effect on the Court’s claim
construction as claim construction briefing and hearing dates are not changed.
DATED this 14th day of December, 2011.
19
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
DUANE H. MATHIOWETZ, SBN 111831
NEIL VOHRA, SBN 270256
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94120-7880
Telephone: (415) 983-1000
Facsimile: (415) 983-1200
20
21
22
23
24
By: /s/ Duane H. Mathiowetz_________
Attorneys for Defendants
TEK GLOBAL S.R.L.
TEK CORPORATION
25
26
27
28
403229266v1
Case No. CV 11-0774-PSG
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
AMENDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
1
JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER MITCHELL LLP
STANLEY M. GIBSON, SBN 162329
GREGORY S. CORDREY, SBN 190144
1900 Avenue of the Stars, Seventh Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: (310) 203-8080
Facsimile: (310) 203-0567
2
3
4
5
By: /s/ Stanley M. Gibson_________
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
SEALANT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
ACCESSORIES MARKETING, INC.
6
7
8
9
10
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
11
12
Dated _________________
12/16/2011
13
_________
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States District Court Magistrate Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
403229266v1
Case No. CV 11-0774-PSG
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
AMENDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
1
2
CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have
3
consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the
4
Court’s ECF System.
5
6
Dated: December 14, 2011
___/s/ Duane H. Mathiowetz______
Duane H. Mathiowetz
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
403229266v1
Case No. CV 11-0774-PSG
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
AMENDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?