TEK Global S.R.L. et.al. v. Sealant Systems International Inc. et.al.

Filing 56

STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR ORDER AMENDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER re 55 Stipulation filed by TEK Corporation, TEK Global, S.R.L. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on December 16, 2011. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP DUANE H. MATHIOWETZ, SBN 111831 50 Fremont Street Post Office Box 7880 San Francisco, CA 94120-7880 Telephone: (415) 983-1000 Facsimile: (415) 983-1200 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP NEIL VOHRA, SBN 270256 725 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2800 Los Angeles, CA 90017-5406 Telephone: (213) 488-7100 Facsimile: (213) 629-1033 8 9 Attorneys for Defendants TEK GLOBAL S.R.L and TEK CORPORATION 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN JOSE DIVISION 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ) SEALANT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, ) INC. AND ACCESSORIES MARKETING, ) INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) TEK GLOBAL S.R.L. and TEK ) CORPORATION, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) Case No. CV 11-0774-PSG (Lead case) STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER AMENDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. CV 11-1649) Hon. Paul S. Grewal 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 403229266v1 Case No. CV 11-0774-PSG STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER AMENDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 1 Counsel for TEK Global and TEK Corporation ("TEK") and Sealant Systems 2 International and Automotive Marketing Inc. ("SSI") have conferred and hereby jointly 3 request the Court to modify certain dates set forth in its Case Management Order [Docket 4 No. 24], as follows: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Patent LR 4-2 Exchange of Proposed Claim Terms, to be changed from December 9, 2011 to January 23, 2012. Patent LR 4-3 Exchange Prelim. Claim & Extrinsic Evidence, to be changed from January 12, 2012 to February 20, 2012. Claim Constr. Discovery Cut-off, to be changed from February 12, 2012 to March 12, 2012. The parties jointly request these changes to allow the parties to facilitate settlement 12 negotiations during January and/or February 2012, prior to incurring significant fees 13 relating to claim construction. 14 15 16 17 18 There have been no previous modifications of the dates set by the Court in its Case Management Order. The proposed changes will have no anticipated effect on the Court’s claim construction as claim construction briefing and hearing dates are not changed. DATED this 14th day of December, 2011. 19 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP DUANE H. MATHIOWETZ, SBN 111831 NEIL VOHRA, SBN 270256 50 Fremont Street San Francisco, CA 94120-7880 Telephone: (415) 983-1000 Facsimile: (415) 983-1200 20 21 22 23 24 By: /s/ Duane H. Mathiowetz_________ Attorneys for Defendants TEK GLOBAL S.R.L. TEK CORPORATION 25 26 27 28 403229266v1 Case No. CV 11-0774-PSG STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER AMENDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 1 JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER MITCHELL LLP STANLEY M. GIBSON, SBN 162329 GREGORY S. CORDREY, SBN 190144 1900 Avenue of the Stars, Seventh Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (310) 203-8080 Facsimile: (310) 203-0567 2 3 4 5 By: /s/ Stanley M. Gibson_________ Attorneys for Plaintiffs SEALANT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. ACCESSORIES MARKETING, INC. 6 7 8 9 10 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 11 12 Dated _________________ 12/16/2011 13 _________ PAUL S. GREWAL United States District Court Magistrate Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 403229266v1 Case No. CV 11-0774-PSG STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER AMENDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 1 2 CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have 3 consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the 4 Court’s ECF System. 5 6 Dated: December 14, 2011 ___/s/ Duane H. Mathiowetz______ Duane H. Mathiowetz 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 403229266v1 Case No. CV 11-0774-PSG STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER AMENDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?