GlobalMedia Group LLC v. Logitech Inc
Filing
58
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE. Signed by Hon. Edward J. Davila on 5/15/2012.(ejdlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2012)
1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
SAN JOSE DIVISION
5
CASE NO. 5:11-CV-00778-EJD
GLOBALMEDIA GROUP LLC,
6
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE;
DENYING AS MOOT MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE
Plaintiff,
7
8
v.
LOGITECH INC,
[Re: Docket Item Nos. 52, 54]
9
Defendant.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
/
On August 15, 2011, GlobalMedia filed a Motion for Leave to File an attached proposed
12
Second Amended Application/Petition to Compel Arbitration (“SAP”). ECF No. 36 & attachment 1.
13
On March 30, 2012, the court granted GlobalMedia’s motion. ECF No. 47. Though the court could
14
have simply deemed the SAP filed as of the date of that order, it instead delegated the responsibility
15
of filing the document to the GlobalMedia. The court set a deadline of April 6, 2012 for the
16
completion of the wholly ministerial task. April 6 came and went; the SAP was filed on April 12.
17
GlobalMedia apologizes and blames a paralegal. ECF No. 55 & attachment 2. Logitech moves to
18
strike the SAP as untimely, complaining of having “40% less time . . . to respond to this so-called
19
amended petition.”
20
The SAP that GlobalMedia filed late is substantially identical to the proposed SAP that has
21
been on record since August 15, 2011. Logitech has suffered no conceivable prejudice from the
22
delay. GlobalMedia’s mistake is excused, and the late filing is accepted. Logitech’s motion to strike
23
is DENIED, and GlobalMedia’s renewed motion for leave to file the SAP is DENIED AS MOOT.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
Dated: May 15, 2012
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
27
28
1
CASE NO. 5:11-CV-00778-EJD
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?