GlobalMedia Group LLC v. Logitech Inc

Filing 58

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE. Signed by Hon. Edward J. Davila on 5/15/2012.(ejdlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 CASE NO. 5:11-CV-00778-EJD GLOBALMEDIA GROUP LLC, 6 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE; DENYING AS MOOT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE Plaintiff, 7 8 v. LOGITECH INC, [Re: Docket Item Nos. 52, 54] 9 Defendant. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 / On August 15, 2011, GlobalMedia filed a Motion for Leave to File an attached proposed 12 Second Amended Application/Petition to Compel Arbitration (“SAP”). ECF No. 36 & attachment 1. 13 On March 30, 2012, the court granted GlobalMedia’s motion. ECF No. 47. Though the court could 14 have simply deemed the SAP filed as of the date of that order, it instead delegated the responsibility 15 of filing the document to the GlobalMedia. The court set a deadline of April 6, 2012 for the 16 completion of the wholly ministerial task. April 6 came and went; the SAP was filed on April 12. 17 GlobalMedia apologizes and blames a paralegal. ECF No. 55 & attachment 2. Logitech moves to 18 strike the SAP as untimely, complaining of having “40% less time . . . to respond to this so-called 19 amended petition.” 20 The SAP that GlobalMedia filed late is substantially identical to the proposed SAP that has 21 been on record since August 15, 2011. Logitech has suffered no conceivable prejudice from the 22 delay. GlobalMedia’s mistake is excused, and the late filing is accepted. Logitech’s motion to strike 23 is DENIED, and GlobalMedia’s renewed motion for leave to file the SAP is DENIED AS MOOT. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: May 15, 2012 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 27 28 1 CASE NO. 5:11-CV-00778-EJD ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?