Chacon v. City of San Jose et al

Filing 18

ORDER denying 17 parties' request to extend time for discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 1/5/2012. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 *E-FILED 01-05-2012* 3 4 5 6 NOT FOR CITATION 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 No. C11-00908 HRL LUIS CHACON, For the Northern District of California United States District Court 7 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 ORDER DENYING PARTIES’ REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME FOR DISCOVERY v. CITY OF SAN JOSE; SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT; OFFICER BARTHELEMY; OFFICER GROMDAHL; and DOES 1-60, [Re: Docket No. 17] Defendants. / 17 18 The parties jointly request an extension of fact discovery and expert disclosure deadlines 19 that were set last May. Granting their request could impact the trial date, and the reasons 20 offered for the request do not satisfactorily explain why nearly seven months were insufficient 21 time for discovery. The extension of time is denied. 22 SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: January 5, 2012 24 ________________________________ HOWARD R. LLOYD 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1 5:11-cv-00908-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to: 2 Karl Anthony Sandoval 3 Michael J. Dodson 4 Sharonrose Cannistraci 5 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. cao.main@sanjoseca.gov cao.main@sanjoseca.gov sharonrose@cannistracilaw.com 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?