Chacon v. City of San Jose et al
Filing
18
ORDER denying 17 parties' request to extend time for discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 1/5/2012. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2012)
1
2
*E-FILED 01-05-2012*
3
4
5
6
NOT FOR CITATION
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
No. C11-00908 HRL
LUIS CHACON,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
7
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
ORDER DENYING PARTIES’ REQUEST
TO EXTEND TIME FOR DISCOVERY
v.
CITY OF SAN JOSE; SAN JOSE POLICE
DEPARTMENT; OFFICER BARTHELEMY;
OFFICER GROMDAHL; and DOES 1-60,
[Re: Docket No. 17]
Defendants.
/
17
18
The parties jointly request an extension of fact discovery and expert disclosure deadlines
19
that were set last May. Granting their request could impact the trial date, and the reasons
20
offered for the request do not satisfactorily explain why nearly seven months were insufficient
21
time for discovery. The extension of time is denied.
22
SO ORDERED.
23
Dated: January 5, 2012
24
________________________________
HOWARD R. LLOYD
25
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
1
5:11-cv-00908-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:
2
Karl Anthony Sandoval
3
Michael J. Dodson
4
Sharonrose Cannistraci
5
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.
cao.main@sanjoseca.gov
cao.main@sanjoseca.gov
sharonrose@cannistracilaw.com
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?