Hudson v. Veterans Administration Palo Alto Health Care Systems
Filing
10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO APPEAR AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 6/21/2011 01:30 PM. Further, the parties are reminded that this civil case has been randomly assigned to a magistrate judge for all purposes incl uding trial. Accordingly, all parties who have not yet done so shall, no later than June 14, 2011, file either (1) a Consent to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge or (2) a Declination to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment to a United States District Judge. See N.D. Cal. Civ. R. 73-1. The consent and declination forms are available at the Clerks Office and may also be obtained from the courts website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 6/1/2011. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2011)
1
** E-filed June 1, 2011 **
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
For the Northern District of California
NOT FOR CITATION
8
United States District Court
7
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
KIMBERLY HUDSON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
VETERANS ADMINISTRATION PALO
ALTO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM,
No. C11-00939 HRL
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:
FAILURE TO APPEAR AND
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
[Re: Docket No. 9]
15
16
17
Defendants.
____________________________________/
On May 31, 2011, this Court held an Initial Case Management Conference in this action.
18
Docket No. 9. Only Defendant appeared. See id. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to appear on
19
June 21, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 2, Fifth Floor, United States District Court, 280 S. First
20
Street, San Jose, California, 95113 to explain why she did not appear at the Initial Case
21
Management Conference and to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to
22
prosecute.
23
Further, the parties are reminded that this civil case has been randomly assigned to a
24
magistrate judge for all purposes including trial. Accordingly, all parties who have not yet done so
25
shall, no later than June 14, 2011, file either (1) a Consent to Proceed before a United States
26
Magistrate Judge or (2) a Declination to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge and Request for
27
Reassignment to a United States District Judge. See N.D. Cal. Civ. R. 73-1. The consent and
28
1
declination forms are available at the Clerk’s Office and may also be obtained from the court’s
2
website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 1, 2011
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
C11-00939 Notice will be electronically mailed to:
2
James A. Scharf
3
Notice will be provided by other means to:
4
Kimberly Hudson
37651 Murietta Terrace
Fremont, CA 94536
5
6
james.scharf@usdoj.gov, mimi.lam@usdoj.gov
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.
7
8
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?