Eyama v. Neal et al

Filing 8

ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY STAY AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Motion Hearing set for 3/17/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Lucy H. Koh. Signed by Judge Koh on 3/3/2011. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2011)

Download PDF
Eyama v. Neal et al Doc. 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No.: 11-CV-00953-LHK ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY STAY AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) ) DAVID L. NEAL, ACTING CHAIRMAN, ) BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS; ) JUAN P. OSUNA, ACTING DIRECTOR, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION ) ) REVIEW; JOHN MORTON, ASSISTANT ) SECRETARY, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND ) CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT; JANET NAPOLITANO, SECRETARY, ) DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; ) ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. ATTORNEY ) GENERAL, ) ) Defendants. ) ) LINDA BIH AUTHUR EYAMA,, Case No.: 11-CV-00953-LHK ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY STAY AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE Plaintiff filed an emergency motion to stay removal on March 3, 2011. Plaintiff is apparently set to report for deportation on March 4, 2011. The Court hereby temporarily STAYS Plaintiff's removal until a hearing may be heard on Plaintiff's request for mandamus relief. Plaintiff's motion shall be heard on March 17, 2011, at 1:30 p.m. Plaintiff must serve on Defendants a copy of this Order, the Complaint, and all other documents filed in this action no later than Friday, March 4, 2011, and file proof of service with the court. Defendants shall file any opposition to Plaintiff's motion by Thursday, March 10, 2011. Plaintiff may file a reply by Monday, March 14, 2011. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 3, 2011 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?