McRee v. Goldman et al

Filing 18

ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference to 8/3/2011 at 2:00 PM. Signed by Judge Koh on 6/16/2011. (Attachments: # 1 certificate of mailing)(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 RICHARD T. MCREE, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD N. GOLDMAN, ET AL., 14 Defendants. 15 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 11-CV-00991-LHK ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE In this patent action, pro se Plaintiff filed his Complaint on March 3, 2011. After 17 reassignment of the case to the undersigned Judge on March 29, 2011, this Court set an initial case 18 management conference for June 22, 2011. However, as of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has still 19 not served Defendants with the Complaint. Accordingly, the initial case management conference is 20 continued to Wednesday, August 3, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. Plaintiff should note that, under Federal 21 Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), failure to timely serve Defendants may result in dismissal of this 22 action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (“If a defendant is not served within 120 days after the complaint 23 is filed, the court — on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff — must dismiss the action 24 without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time.”). 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 Dated: June 16, 2011 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 28 1 Case No.: 11-CV-00991-LHK ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?