Oracle America, Inc. v. Innovative Technology Distributors, LLC
Filing
96
ORDER re (94 in 5:11-cv-01043-LHK) Stipulation Extending Due Date for Discovery Opposition Letter Brief. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 11/21/11. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2011)
Case5:11-cv-01043-LHK Document94
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
MERYL MACKLIN (CA State Bar No. 115053)
meryl.macklin@hro.com
HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP
560 Mission Street, 25th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-2994
Telephone: (415) 268-2000
Facsimile: (415) 268-1999
Filed11/14/11 Page1 of 3
ROBERT S. FRIEDMAN (pro hac vice)
SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER &
HAMPTON LLP
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112
Telephone: (212) 653-8700
Facsimile:
(212) 653-8701
JEFFREY S. ROSS (CA State Bar No. 138172)
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.
500 Oracle Parkway, 7th Floor
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 506-5200
Facsimile: (650) 506-7114
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Oracle America, Inc.
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. 5:11-CV-01043-LHK
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE EXTENSION OF DUE DATE FOR
REPLY BRIEF
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY
DISTRIBUTORS LLC
Defendant.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF DUE DATE FOR REPLY BRIEF
Oracle America, Inc. v. Innovative Technology Distributors LLC
Case No. 5:11-CV-01043-LHK
Case5:11-cv-01043-LHK Document94
1
Filed11/14/11 Page2 of 3
WHEREAS the Case Management Order entered on July 21, 2011 provides that each party
2
may submit a three-page letter brief to the Court if the parties are unable to resolve a discovery
3
dispute;
4
5
6
7
WHEREAS the Case Management Order does not specify a due date for submitting a reply
letter brief after an opening letter brief has been filed;
WHEREAS the Court’s Clerk advised on November 14, 2011, that reply letter briefs are due
five days after receipt of an opening brief;
8
WHEREAS Innovative Technology Distributors LLC (“ITD”) filed a letter brief on
9
November 9, 2011, raising certain issues in connection with the entry of a discovery confidentiality
10
11
12
13
14
15
order in this case;
WHEREAS Oracle intends to file a reply brief in opposition to ITD’s letter brief dated
November 9, 2011, and is seeking a short extension of time for its reply;
WHEREAS ITD has agreed to give Oracle a short extension of time for its reply brief, up to
and including November 18, 2011.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND AGREE, through their respective
16
counsel, that Oracle’s reply brief in opposition to ITD’s letter brief dated November 9, 2011, shall be
17
due no later than November 18, 2011.
18
19
Dated: November 14, 2011
HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP
20
By: /s/ Meryl Macklin
Meryl Macklin
Attorneys for Plaintiff Oracle America, Inc.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dated: November 14, 2011
GCA LAW PARTNERS LLP
By: /s/ Valerie M. Wagner
Valerie M. Wagner
Attorneys for Defendant Innovative Technology
Distributors LLC.
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF DUE DATE FOR REPLY BRIEF
Oracle America, Inc. v. Innovative Technology Distributors LLC
Case No. 5:11-CV-01043-LHK
Case5:11-cv-01043-LHK Document94
1
2
3
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
21
Dated: November ___, 2011
______________________________________
The Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
Filed11/14/11 Page3 of 3
GENERAL ORDER 45 ATTESTATION
I, Meryl Macklin, hereby attest, pursuant to N.D. Cal. General Order No. 45, that
concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto.
8
/s/ Meryl Macklin
Meryl Macklin
Attorneys for Oracle America, Inc.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF DUE DATE FOR REPLY BRIEF
Oracle America, Inc. v. Innovative Technology Distributors LLC
Case No. 5:11-CV-01043-LHK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?