Emblaze Ltd. v. Apple Inc.
Filing
161
ORDER ALLOWING PERMISSION TO BRING TO COURT CERTAIN MULTIMEDIA EQUIPMENT, granting 159 . Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 4/10/2013. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
SARAH BARROWS (SBN 253278)
barrowss@gtlaw.com
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94111-5983
Telephone: (415) 655-1300
Facsimile: (415) 707-2010
Michael A. Nicodema (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
nicodemam@gtlaw.com
James J. DeCarlo (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
decarloj@gtlaw.com
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
MetLife Building
200 Park Avenue, 34th Floor
New York, New York 10166
Tel.: (212) 801-9200
Fax: (212) 801-6400
Attorneys for Defendant,
Apple Inc.
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN JOSE DIVISION
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
EMBLAZE LTD.,
Plaintiff;
v.
CASE NO. 5:11-CV-01079 PSG
[PROPOSED] ORDER ALLOWING
PERMISSION TO BRING TO COURT
CERTAIN MULTIMEDIA EQUIPMENT
APPLE INC., a California Corporation,
Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER ALLOWING PERMISSION
TO BRING TO COURT CERTAIN MULTIMEDIA
EQUIPMENT
CASE NO. 5:11-CV-01079 PSG
1
2
3
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Apple, Inc. shall be permitted to use a
multimedia system for the presentation of evidence. Defendant shall be permitted to bring into the
Court on April 17, 2013 certain multimedia equipment.
5
The equipment will include the following:
6
(1)
(5) Laptop computers with built-in cameras;
(2)
(2) sets of Computer Cables and Power Cords;
(3)
(1) Printer/Copier;
(4)
Extension Cords;
11
(5)
Small Computer Table;
12
(6)
Projector and Screen; and
13
(7)
Computer Speakers.
14
SO ORDERED this _______ day of ____________, 2013.
April
10th
7
8
9
10
15
16
The Honorable Magistrate Judge of the Northern
District of California Paul S. Grewal
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER ALLOWING PERMISSION
TO BRING TO COURT CERTAIN MULTIMEDIA
EQUIPMENT
-1-
CASE NO. 5:11-CV-01079 PSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?