Emblaze Ltd. v. Apple Inc.

Filing 358

AMENDED ORDER re: 357 GRANTING-IN-PART EMBLAZE'S MOTION FOR RELIEF PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-3. re: 343 MOTION for Summary Judgment of No Willful Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,389,473, 346 MOTION for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement as to All Accused Streams, 348 MOTION for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of Specific Content Providers, and 350 MOTION for Summary Judgment of Invalidity. Responses due by 3/13/2014. Replies due by 3/27/2014. Motion Hearing set for 4/8/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 4th Floor, San Jose before Magistrate Judge Paul Singh Grewal. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on February 24, 2014. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 EMBLAZE LTD., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. APPLE INC., 15 Defendant. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 5:11-cv-01079-PSG AMENDED ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART EMBLAZE’S MOTION FOR RELIEF PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-3 (Re: Docket No. 355) Before the court is Plaintiff Emblaze Ltd.’s request for an extension of time to respond to 17 18 Defendant Apple Inc.’s motions for summary judgment. 1 Emblaze’s motion is GRANTED, but 19 only IN PART. Emblaze shall file any opposition(s) by March 13, 2014. Any reply briefing shall 20 be filed by March 27, 2014. The hearing date will be continued for one week – until Tuesday, 21 April 8, 2014. 22 23 24 25 26 1 27 28 See Civil L.R. 6-3; Civil L.R. 7-1(b) (“In the Judge’s discretion, or upon request by counsel and with the Judge’s approval, a motion may be determined without oral argument or by telephone conference call.”). 1 Case No. 5:11-cv-01079-PSG ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART EMBLAZE’S MOTION FOR RELIEF PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?