Emblaze Ltd. v. Apple Inc.

Filing 377

ORDER GRANTING SEALING OF AKAMAI'S EXHIBIT. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on March 7, 2014. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

8

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11

EMBLAZE LTD.,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
APPLE INC.,

15

Defendant.

16

Case No. 5:11-cv-01079-PSG
ORDER GRANTING SEALING OF
AKAMAI’S EXHIBIT
(Re: Docket No. 347-12)

The court notes that Akamai submitted a well-supported declaration 1 supporting the sealing

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

of a single exhibit. 2 It may be sealed.

19
20
21
1

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

See Docket No. 367 at ¶ 5 (The document entitled Engineering Product Design: Universal
Streaming: RTMP to HLS Version 1.1 “includes internal and non-public product design and
implementation details, product management details, internal discussion regarding constraints and
limitations in the existing design, details regarding future extensions of the product, details
regarding features of the design that are not exposed to customers, testing constraints, and other
non-public engineering details. In addition, the document provides specific details regarding
Akamai’s internal database schema used to collect data from Akamai servers that implement this
design. Using information in that schema, an attacker theoretically could learn how to query
Akamai internal systems and thus obtain additional information from the Akamai services
platform. Any such attack on Akamai systems would pose significant security concerns including
exposing customer data, which Akamai has an obligation to maintain confidential, to improper
scrutiny.”).
2

See Docket No. 347-12, Ex. 9.

1
Case No. 5:11-cv-01079-PSG
ORDER GRANTING SEALING OF AKAMAI’S EXHIBIT