Emblaze Ltd. v. Apple Inc.
Filing
602
VERDICT FORM. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on July 10, 2014. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2014)
1
B.
FINDINGS ON INVALIDITY
2
ANTICIPATION
3
3.
4
5
Did you find by clear and convincing evidence that any of the following claims are invalid
as anticipated by the prior art?
Answer “YES” or “NO” for each listed claim. (An answer of YES is a finding for
Apple. An answer of NO is a finding for Emblaze).
6
7
Claim 23
______
Claim 37
9
______
Claim 28
8
______
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
OBVIOUSNESS
4.
Did you find by clear and convincing evidence that any of the following claims are invalid
as obvious in view of the prior art?
Answer “YES” or “NO” for each listed claim. (An answer of YES is a finding for
Apple. An answer of NO is a finding for Emblaze).
15
16
Claim 23
______
17
Claim 28
______
18
Claim 37
______
19
Claim 40
______
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Case No. 5:11-cv-01079-PSG
VERDICT FORM
1
C.
FINDINGS ON DAMAGES
REASONABLE ROYALTY
2
If you have found any claim infringed and not invalid, answer Questions 5-7.
Otherwise, do not answer Questions 5-7.
3
4
5
5.
6
In the hypothetical negotiation, do you find that the parties would have agreed to a license
agreement for a running royalty or for a fully paid-up lump sum? Choose only one.
Running royalty: ______
OR
Fully paid-up lump sum: _______
7
8
Only answer the following Question 6 if you chose “running royalty” in Question 5. If
you chose “fully paid-up lump sum” in Question 5 skip to Question 7.
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
6.
11
12
What “royalty base” and what “royalty rate” do you find from a preponderance of the
evidence would fairly and reasonably compensate Emblaze for Apple's infringement
through June 30, 2013 (fill in the numbers in the empty columns):
ROYALTY BASE
13
ROYALTY RATE
Number of Devices
amount per unit ($)
Number of Software
Upgrades
amount per unit ($)
Total Amount of
Application Revenues
percentage (%)
14
15
16
17
18
19
Only answer the following Question 7 if you chose “fully paid-up lump sum” in
Question 5.
20
22
What paid-up lump sum of money, if paid now in cash, do you find from a preponderance
of the evidence would fairly and reasonably compensate Emblaze for Apple’s
infringement?
23
Answer with the amount: $
21
7.
24
Certification of Jury Verdict
25
_________________________
JURY FOREPERSON
26
________________________
DATE
27
28
5
Case No. 5:11-cv-01079-PSG
VERDICT FORM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?