Emblaze Ltd. v. Apple Inc.
Filing
606
ORDER RE: APPLE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT'S PRIOR SEALING ORDER 519 by Judge Paul S. Grewal granting-in-part 552 (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
EMBLAZE LTD.,
12
Plaintiff,
v.
13
14
APPLE INC.,
Defendant.
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 5:11-cv-01079-PSG
ORDER RE: APPLE’S MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION OF THE
COURT’S PRIOR SEALING ORDER
(Re: Docket No. 552)
16
Before the court is a motion construed as a motion for leave to file a motion for
17
reconsideration 1 of the court’s prior order addressing a series of administrative motions to file
18
certain documents under seal. 2 Apple does not squarely address the burden it faces under
19
20
Civil L.R. 7-9, but rather files its motion “to further establish good cause and to clarify the reasons
21
it seeks to seal narrowly tailored redacted portions” of certain documents. 3 In light of the burden
22
the parties faced preparing for and during trial, the court will move beyond the procedural
23
shortcomings of this approach and focus on the merits of Apple’s request. 4
24
1
See Docket No. 552.
2
See Docket No. 519.
3
Docket No. 552 at 1.
4
See Docket No. 552-1.
25
26
27
28
1
Case No. 5:11-cv-01079-PSG
ORDER RE: APPLE’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT’S PRIOR SEALING ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?