Emblaze Ltd. v. Apple Inc.

Filing 606

ORDER RE: APPLE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT'S PRIOR SEALING ORDER 519 by Judge Paul S. Grewal granting-in-part 552 (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 EMBLAZE LTD., 12 Plaintiff, v. 13 14 APPLE INC., Defendant. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 5:11-cv-01079-PSG ORDER RE: APPLE’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT’S PRIOR SEALING ORDER (Re: Docket No. 552) 16 Before the court is a motion construed as a motion for leave to file a motion for 17 reconsideration 1 of the court’s prior order addressing a series of administrative motions to file 18 certain documents under seal. 2 Apple does not squarely address the burden it faces under 19 20 Civil L.R. 7-9, but rather files its motion “to further establish good cause and to clarify the reasons 21 it seeks to seal narrowly tailored redacted portions” of certain documents. 3 In light of the burden 22 the parties faced preparing for and during trial, the court will move beyond the procedural 23 shortcomings of this approach and focus on the merits of Apple’s request. 4 24 1 See Docket No. 552. 2 See Docket No. 519. 3 Docket No. 552 at 1. 4 See Docket No. 552-1. 25 26 27 28 1 Case No. 5:11-cv-01079-PSG ORDER RE: APPLE’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT’S PRIOR SEALING ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?