Levi Strauss & Co. v. Quiksilver, Inc.
Filing
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE; pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys fees re 20 Stipulation. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/7/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
GREGORY S. GILCHRIST (Bar # 111536)
GIA L. CINCONE (Bar # 141668)
Two Embarcadero Center, 8th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 576-0200
Facsimile: (415) 576-0300
Email: ggilchrist@kilpatricktownsend.com, gcincone@kilpatricktownsend.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LEVI STRAUSS & CO.
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
RYAN PADDEN (Bar # 204515)
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 984-8700
Facsimile: (415) 984-8701
Email: rpadden@omm.com
Attorneys for Defendant
QUIKSILVER, INC.
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
LEVI STRAUSS & CO.,
18
19
20
21
Case No. 11 1177 EJD
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT
PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
v.
QUIKSILVER, INC.,
Defendant.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
-1-
Levi Strauss & Co. v. Quiksilver, Inc.
Case No. 11 1177 EJD
1
The parties, by their respective counsel and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
2
41(a)(2), stipulate that this action be and hereby is dismissed without prejudice. Each party shall bear
3
its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
4
5
Respectfully submitted,
6
7
DATED: October 5, 2011
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
8
By:
9
10
/s/ Gia Cincone
GIA CINCONE
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LEVI STRAUSS & CO.
11
12
13
DATED: October 5, 2011
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
By: /s/Ryan Padden
RYAN PADDEN
14
15
Attorneys for Defendant
QUIKSILVER, INC.
16
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
The Clerk shall close this file.
19
20
DATED: October 7
____________, 2011
21
22
_______________________________
HON. EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Court Judge
63760456 v1
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
-2-
Levi Strauss & Co. v. Quiksilver, Inc.
Case No. 11 1177 EJD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?