Cullen v. Netflix, Inc.

Filing 36

STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT CONTINUING MOTION HEARING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 34 Stipulation. Set/Reset Deadlines as to: 31 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint : Motion Hearing set for 1/6/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. Case Management Conference set for 1/6/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/23/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2011)

Download PDF
5 6 S Attorneys for Defendant NETFLIX, INC. UNIT ED DONALD CULLEN and the Putative Class 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN JOSE DIVISION ERED O ORD D IT IS S DIFIE AS MO NO 9 RT DONALD CULLEN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Case No. dw J u d ge E ER a rd J . D avila H 12 13 RT U O 7 ISTRIC ES D TC AT Attorneys for Plaintiff T R NIA 4 FO 3 GREGORY S. WESTON (No. 239944) JACK FITZGERALD (No. 257370) MELANIE PERSINGER (No. 275423) THE WESTON FIRM 1405 Morena Boulevard, Suite 201 San Diego, California 92110 Telephone: 619.798.2006 Facsimile: 480.247.4553 Email: greg@westonfirm.com jack@westonfirm.com mel@westonfirm.com LI 2 DAVID F. MCDOWELL (No. 125806) JACOB M. HARPER (No. 259463) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 555 West Fifth Street, Suite 3500 Los Angeles, California 90013-1024 Telephone: 213.892.5200 Facsimile: 213.892.5454 Email: DMcDowell@mofo.com JacobHarper@mofo.com A 1 N F D IS T IC T O R C 5:11-cv-01199-EJD 14 Plaintiff, 18 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT BY ONE WEEK; DECLARATION OF DAVID F. McDOWELL 19 [L. R. 6-2, 7-12] 20 Current Date: December 2, 2011 21 Proposed Date: Time: Judge: Courtroom: December 9, 2011 10:00 a.m. Hon. Edward J. Davila 1 15 v. 16 NETFLIX, INC., 17 Defendant. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CULLEN V. NETFLIX, INC., CASE NO. 5:11-cv-01199-EJD 1 STIP. TO CONTINUE MTD HEARING AND CMC 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Plaintiff Donald Cullen (“Plaintiff”) and defendant Netflix, Inc. (“Defendant”) (together, 3 the “Parties”) hereby submit the following stipulated request to continue the case management 4 conference and hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint by 5 one week from December 2, 2011 to December 9, 2011: 6 WHEREAS — 7 1. 8 On September 5, 2011, Plaintiff filed his Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 26); 9 2. On October 5, 2011, Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended 10 Complaint (Dky. No. 31), with the hearing noticed for December 2, 2011 per prior stipulation and 11 order (Dkt. No. 24); 12 3. Because of an unavoidable court-ordered mandatory settlement conference in 13 another case in the Southern District of Ohio, counsel for Netflix will be unable to attend the 14 hearing and case management conference currently scheduled in this matter for December 2, 15 2011. As explained more fully in the attached Declaration of David F. McDowell, counsel for 16 Netflix has attempted to change, but cannot, the date of the conflicting settlement conference; 17 18 4. The Parties respectfully request a modest one-week continuance of the conference hearing date to December 9, 2011; 19 5. 20 this matter. 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 Netflix has not previously requested a continuance of any hearing or conference in // 28 CULLEN V. NETFLIX, INC., CASE NO. 5:11-cv-01199-EJD 2 STIP. TO CONTINUE MTD HEARING AND CMC 1 WHEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE that the case management 2 conference and hearing on Netflix’s Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint be 3 continued by one week from December 2, 2011, to December 9, 2011. 4 IT IS SO STIPULATED: 6 DAVID F. MCDOWELL JACOB M. HARPER MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 7 By: 5 Dated: November 21, 2011 8 9 Dated: November 21, 2011 /s/ David F. McDowell David F. McDowell Attorneys for Defendant NETFLIX, INC. 10 GREGORY S. WESTON JACK FITZGERALD 11 By: 12 13 14 15 16 17 /s/ Jack Fitzgerald Jack Fitzgerald Attorneys for Plaintiff DONALD CULLEN IT IS SO ORDERED The Hearing and Case Management Conference are continued to January 6, 2012 at 9:00 AM IT AM respectively. and 10:00IS SO ORDERED: Dated: November __, 2011 23 By: Hon. Edward J. Davila UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CULLEN V. NETFLIX, INC., CASE NO. 5:11-cv-01199-EJD 3 STIP. TO CONTINUE MTD HEARING AND CMC 1 2 DECLARATION OF DAVID F. McDOWELL I, David F. McDowell, state and declare: 3 1. I am a partner with Morrison & Foerster LLP, counsel of record for defendant 4 Netflix, Inc. (“Defendant”) in the above captioned matter, and am a member in good standing of 5 the State Bar of California. I submit this declaration in support of the parties’ Stipulation to 6 Continue the Case Management Conference and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Second 7 Amended Complaint by One Week. I have personal knowledge of the statements set forth below, 8 which are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and I could and would testify to them. 9 2. I have been ordered to engage in a mandatory settlement conference in Ehlers v. 10 Restoration Hardware, Inc., S.D. Ohio Case No. 2:10-cv-01147, by December 5, 2011. Because 11 of the number of parties and individuals involved, it has been extraordinarily difficult to schedule 12 a date for this conference, and the only date available for the other parties and counsel to comply 13 with the Court’s deadline is December 2, 2011. That date, however, creates a direct conflict with 14 the case management conference and motion to dismiss hearing in this matter. 15 16 3. continuance of the Court’s December 5 deadline. 17 18 I have been unable to reschedule the mandatory settlement conference or obtain a 4. Counsel for plaintiff Donald Cullen (“Plaintiff”) has agreed to continue the case management conference and hearing in this matter to December 9, 2011. 19 5. I respectfully request, therefore, a modest one-week continuance from December 20 2, 2011, to December 9, 2011, for the scheduled case management conference and hearing on 21 Defendant’s motion to dismiss. I request this continuance in the interests of justice and believe 22 this modest continuance would not unduly delay this matter. 23 6. 24 I declare under penalty of perjury that, to the best of my knowledge, the foregoing 25 Counsel has not previously sought a continuance of any hearing in this matter. statements are true and correct. Executed on November 21, 2011, in Los Angeles, California. 26 27 /s/ David F. McDowell David F. McDowell 1149784 28 CULLEN V. NETFLIX, INC., CASE NO. 5:11-cv-01199-EJD 4 STIP. TO CONTINUE MTD HEARING AND CMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?