Cullen v. Netflix, Inc.
Filing
36
STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT CONTINUING MOTION HEARING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 34 Stipulation. Set/Reset Deadlines as to: 31 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint : Motion Hearing set for 1/6/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. Case Management Conference set for 1/6/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/23/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2011)
5
6
S
Attorneys for Defendant
NETFLIX, INC.
UNIT
ED
DONALD CULLEN and
the Putative Class
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN JOSE DIVISION
ERED
O ORD D
IT IS S
DIFIE
AS MO
NO
9
RT
DONALD CULLEN, on behalf of himself and
all others similarly situated,
Case No.
dw
J u d ge E
ER
a rd J . D
avila
H
12
13
RT
U
O
7
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
Attorneys for Plaintiff T
R NIA
4
FO
3
GREGORY S. WESTON (No. 239944)
JACK FITZGERALD (No. 257370)
MELANIE PERSINGER (No. 275423)
THE WESTON FIRM
1405 Morena Boulevard, Suite 201
San Diego, California 92110
Telephone: 619.798.2006
Facsimile:
480.247.4553
Email:
greg@westonfirm.com
jack@westonfirm.com
mel@westonfirm.com
LI
2
DAVID F. MCDOWELL (No. 125806)
JACOB M. HARPER (No. 259463)
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
555 West Fifth Street, Suite 3500
Los Angeles, California 90013-1024
Telephone: 213.892.5200
Facsimile:
213.892.5454
Email:
DMcDowell@mofo.com
JacobHarper@mofo.com
A
1
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
5:11-cv-01199-EJD
14
Plaintiff,
18
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT BY ONE
WEEK; DECLARATION OF DAVID F.
McDOWELL
19
[L. R. 6-2, 7-12]
20
Current Date:
December 2, 2011
21
Proposed Date:
Time:
Judge:
Courtroom:
December 9, 2011
10:00 a.m.
Hon. Edward J. Davila
1
15
v.
16
NETFLIX, INC.,
17
Defendant.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CULLEN V. NETFLIX, INC., CASE NO. 5:11-cv-01199-EJD
1
STIP. TO CONTINUE MTD HEARING AND CMC
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
2
Plaintiff Donald Cullen (“Plaintiff”) and defendant Netflix, Inc. (“Defendant”) (together,
3
the “Parties”) hereby submit the following stipulated request to continue the case management
4
conference and hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint by
5
one week from December 2, 2011 to December 9, 2011:
6
WHEREAS —
7
1.
8
On September 5, 2011, Plaintiff filed his Second Amended Complaint (Dkt.
No. 26);
9
2.
On October 5, 2011, Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended
10
Complaint (Dky. No. 31), with the hearing noticed for December 2, 2011 per prior stipulation and
11
order (Dkt. No. 24);
12
3.
Because of an unavoidable court-ordered mandatory settlement conference in
13
another case in the Southern District of Ohio, counsel for Netflix will be unable to attend the
14
hearing and case management conference currently scheduled in this matter for December 2,
15
2011. As explained more fully in the attached Declaration of David F. McDowell, counsel for
16
Netflix has attempted to change, but cannot, the date of the conflicting settlement conference;
17
18
4.
The Parties respectfully request a modest one-week continuance of the conference
hearing date to December 9, 2011;
19
5.
20
this matter.
21
//
22
//
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
Netflix has not previously requested a continuance of any hearing or conference in
//
28
CULLEN V. NETFLIX, INC., CASE NO. 5:11-cv-01199-EJD
2
STIP. TO CONTINUE MTD HEARING AND CMC
1
WHEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE that the case management
2
conference and hearing on Netflix’s Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint be
3
continued by one week from December 2, 2011, to December 9, 2011.
4
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
6
DAVID F. MCDOWELL
JACOB M. HARPER
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
7
By:
5
Dated:
November 21, 2011
8
9
Dated:
November 21, 2011
/s/ David F. McDowell
David F. McDowell
Attorneys for Defendant
NETFLIX, INC.
10
GREGORY S. WESTON
JACK FITZGERALD
11
By:
12
13
14
15
16
17
/s/ Jack Fitzgerald
Jack Fitzgerald
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DONALD CULLEN
IT IS SO ORDERED
The Hearing and Case Management Conference are continued to January 6, 2012 at 9:00 AM
IT AM respectively.
and 10:00IS SO ORDERED:
Dated:
November __, 2011
23
By:
Hon. Edward J. Davila
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CULLEN V. NETFLIX, INC., CASE NO. 5:11-cv-01199-EJD
3
STIP. TO CONTINUE MTD HEARING AND CMC
1
2
DECLARATION OF DAVID F. McDOWELL
I, David F. McDowell, state and declare:
3
1.
I am a partner with Morrison & Foerster LLP, counsel of record for defendant
4
Netflix, Inc. (“Defendant”) in the above captioned matter, and am a member in good standing of
5
the State Bar of California. I submit this declaration in support of the parties’ Stipulation to
6
Continue the Case Management Conference and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Second
7
Amended Complaint by One Week. I have personal knowledge of the statements set forth below,
8
which are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and I could and would testify to them.
9
2.
I have been ordered to engage in a mandatory settlement conference in Ehlers v.
10
Restoration Hardware, Inc., S.D. Ohio Case No. 2:10-cv-01147, by December 5, 2011. Because
11
of the number of parties and individuals involved, it has been extraordinarily difficult to schedule
12
a date for this conference, and the only date available for the other parties and counsel to comply
13
with the Court’s deadline is December 2, 2011. That date, however, creates a direct conflict with
14
the case management conference and motion to dismiss hearing in this matter.
15
16
3.
continuance of the Court’s December 5 deadline.
17
18
I have been unable to reschedule the mandatory settlement conference or obtain a
4.
Counsel for plaintiff Donald Cullen (“Plaintiff”) has agreed to continue the case
management conference and hearing in this matter to December 9, 2011.
19
5.
I respectfully request, therefore, a modest one-week continuance from December
20
2, 2011, to December 9, 2011, for the scheduled case management conference and hearing on
21
Defendant’s motion to dismiss. I request this continuance in the interests of justice and believe
22
this modest continuance would not unduly delay this matter.
23
6.
24
I declare under penalty of perjury that, to the best of my knowledge, the foregoing
25
Counsel has not previously sought a continuance of any hearing in this matter.
statements are true and correct. Executed on November 21, 2011, in Los Angeles, California.
26
27
/s/ David F. McDowell
David F. McDowell
1149784
28
CULLEN V. NETFLIX, INC., CASE NO. 5:11-cv-01199-EJD
4
STIP. TO CONTINUE MTD HEARING AND CMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?