Cullen v. Netflix, Inc.
Filing
46
ORDER Regarding Supplemental Briefing, re 44 . Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on February 16, 2012. (ejdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
DONALD CULLEN,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
v.
NETFLIX, INC.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 5:11-CV-1199 EJD
ORDER REGARDING
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING
(Re: Docket No. 44)
On February 2, 2012, the parties filed a Joint Statement of Supplemental Authority
17
informing the court that the Federal Communication Commission has issued its implementing
18
regulations concerning Section 202 of the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video
19
Accessibility Act, addressing the closed captioning of video over Internet protocol. See Docket No.
20
44. The parties also inform the court that they believe additional briefing on the regulations’ impact
21
on this litigation and the pending motion to dismiss would help the court. Accordingly,
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than March 23, 2012, the parties shall file a joint
23
status report summarizing the FCC’s regulations, their impact on the pending motion to dismiss,
24
any impact on how the case should proceed, and any other information the parties believe would be
25
useful to the court. To the extent the parties cannot agree on any portion of the joint statement, they
26
27
28
1
Case No.: 5:11-CV-1199 EJD
ORDER REGARDING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING
1
may file separate statements. This joint statement shall not exceed fifteen pages.
2
Dated: February 16, 2012
3
4
_________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 5:11-CV-1199 EJD
ORDER REGARDING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?