Tetsuya et al-v- Amazon.Com,Inc

Filing 22

ORDER Setting Deadline for Plaintiff to Either Consent or Decline to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's consent or declination due by 5/31/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 5/18/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 *E-FILED 05-18-2011* 3 4 5 6 NOT FOR CITATION 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 7 12 13 14 No. C11-01210 HRL JOE NOMURA TETSUYA, ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO EITHER CONSENT OR DECLINE TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff, v. AMAZON.COM, INC., 15 Defendant. / 16 17 Plaintiff is reminded that this case has been assigned to the undersigned magistrate 18 judge. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 73-1(a)(2), no later than May 31, 2011, plaintiff must 19 file either (1) a Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge or (2) a 20 Declination to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment to a United 21 States District Judge. The forms are available from the Clerk of the Court and on the court=s 22 website at http://cand.uscourts.gov. SO ORDERED. 23 24 Dated: May 18, 2011 25 HOWARD R. LLOYD 26 27 28 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 5:11-cv-01210-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to: 2 Bryan J. Sinclair 3 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program. bryan.sinclair@klgates.com, adrienne.wilson@klgates.com 4 5 5:11-cv-01210-HRL Notice mailed to: 6 7 Joe Nomura Tetsuya 3288 Pierce Street, Suite C-129 Richmond, CA 94804 8 Pro Se Plaintiff 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?