In re Finisar Corporation Securities Litigation

Filing 50

STIPULATION AND ORDER Regarding Scheduling of Consolidated Complaint and Case Caption re 49 Stipulation. The case shall be recaptioned "In re Finisar Corporation Securities Litigation," retaining its case number (5:11-CV-01252-EJD). Amend ed Pleadings due by 1/13/2012. Motion due by 3/13/2012. Opposition due by 4/16/2012. Reply due by 5/11/2012. Motion Hearing set for 6/1/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. Joint Case Management Statement due by 5/25/2012. Case Management Conference set for 6/1/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/07/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 DLA PIPER LLP (US) SHIRLI FABBRI WEISS (Bar No. 079225) shirli.weiss@dlapiper.com DAVID PRIEBE (Bar No. 148679) david.priebe@dlapiper.com ROY K. McDONALD (CA Bar No. 193691) roy.mcdonald@dlapiper.com RAJIV DHARNIDHARKA (Bar No. 234756) rajiv.dharnidharka@dlapiper.com 2000 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2248 Tel: (650) 833-2000 Fax: (650) 833-2001 Attorneys for Defendants FINISAR CORPORATION, JERRY S. RAWLS, EITAN GERTEL, and KURT ADZEMA [Counsel for Lead Plaintiff listed on signature page] 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 MARTIN DERCHI-RUSSO, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 17 18 19 20 21 Case No. CV 11-1252 EJD HRL Class Action STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING OF CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT AND CASE CAPTION Plaintiff, vs. FINISAR CORPORATION, JERRY S. RAWLS, EITAN GERTEL, and KURT ADZEMA, Defendants 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 #225368157 (WEST) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING AND CASE CAPTION Case Nos. CV 11-1252 EJD HRL 1 STIPULATION 2 Lead Plaintiff Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System (“Lead Plaintiff”) 3 and Defendants Finisar Corporation, Jerry S. Rawls, Eitan Gertel, and Kurt Adzema (collectively 4 “Defendants”) hereby stipulate as follows: 5 WHEREAS, by Order dated October 27, 2011, the Court granted Lead Plaintiff’s motion 6 for appointment as Lead Plaintiff in this securities class action litigation involving Finisar 7 Corporation, and appointed its counsel as Lead Counsel; and, 8 WHEREAS, by the same Order, the Court also granted Lead Plaintiff’s motion to 9 consolidate the two related securities class action cases involving Finisar Corporation, under the 10 lower case number 5:11-CV-01252-EJD; and, 11 WHEREAS, by the same Order, the Court ordered Defendants and the appointed Lead 12 Counsel to meet and confer in order to agree on a schedule for the next stage of the case, 13 including the timing of a consolidated complaint and motion to dismiss; and, 14 15 WHEREAS, as ordered, the parties have met and conferred and reached an agreement; and, 16 WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiff proposes for the interests of clarity and efficiency to file a 17 consolidated complaint under the caption “In re Finisar Corporation Securities Litigation,” as 18 Lead Plaintiff is not the named plaintiff in the case number under which the cases were 19 consolidated (5:11-CV-01252-EJD), and Defendants agree that this change would be beneficial; 20 and, 21 WHEREAS, the parties also suggest and agree that it would serve the interests of judicial 22 economy to hold the next Case Management Conference on the same date as the hearing of the 23 motion to dismiss, 24 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT: 25 1. 26 retaining its case number (5:11-CV-01252-EJD). 27 28 The case shall be recaptioned “In re Finisar Corporation Securities Litigation,” 2. Lead Plaintiff shall file a consolidated complaint under the revised caption on or before January 13, 2012. -1 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING AND CASE CAPTION Case No. CV 11-1252 EJD HRL 1 3. Defendants shall move to dismiss the consolidated complaint on or before March 2 13, 2012, with the motion noticed for hearing on a date to be set by the Court consistent with this 3 briefing schedule. 4 4. 5 16, 2012. 6 5. 7 6. The Case Management Conference presently scheduled for December 9, 2011 shall be continued for the same date as the hearing of the motion to dismiss. 10 11 Defendants shall file their reply in support of the motion to dismiss on or before May 11, 2012. 8 9 Lead Plaintiff shall file its opposition to the motion to dismiss on or before April Respectfully submitted, November 2, 2011 ABRAHAM, FRUCHER & TWERSKY, LLP Ian D. Berg (Bar #263586) 12526 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92130 12 13 Mitchell M.Z. Twersky Ximena R. Skovron One Penn Plaza, Suite 2805 New York, NY 10119 14 15 16 By: /s/ Ian D. Berg _____ Attorneys for Lead Plaintiff OKLAHOMA FIREFIGHTERS PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM 17 18 19 November 2, 2011 DLA PIPER LLP (US) 20 22 By: /s/ David Priebe Attorneys for Defendants FINISAR CORPORATION, JERRY S. RAWLS, EITAN GERTEL, and KURT ADZEMA 23 ORDER 24 Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 25 The Hearing date on the Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Complaint is set for June 1, 2012 at 9:00 AM. The Case Management Conference is also set for June 1, 2012 at 10:00 AM. The 26 parties' shall file a Joint Case Mangement Conference statement on or before May 25, 2012. 27 Dated: November _7_, 2011 28 -2 - ____________________________________ EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING AND CASE CAPTION Case No. CV 11-1252 EJD HRL 1 ATTESTATION OF AUTHORIZATION FOR ELECTRONIC FILING 2 I, David Priebe, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING OF 4 CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT AND CASE CAPTION. In compliance with General Order 5 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Ian D. Berg has concurred in this filing. 6 November __, 2011 /s/ David Priebe 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING AND CASE CAPTION Case No. CV 11-1252 EJD HRL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?