Woods v. Google, Inc.

Filing 215

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT GOOGLE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE 212 Stipulation filed by Google, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/29/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MAYER BROWN LLP Edward D. Johnson (SBN 189475) wjohnson@mayerbrown.com Donald M. Falk (SBN 150256) dfalk@mayerbrown.com Eric B. Evans (SBN 232476) eevans@mayerbrown.com Dominique-Chantale Alepin (SBN 241648) dalepin@mayerbrown.com Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112 Telephone: (650) 331-2000 Facsimile: (650) 331-2060 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Matthew H. Marmolejo (SBN 242964) mmarmolejo@mayerbrown.com 350 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 2500 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 229-9500 Facsimile: (213) 625-0248 Sarah E. Reynolds (admitted pro hac vice) sreynolds@mayerbrown.com 71 S. Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 Telephone: (312) 782-0600 Facsimile: (312) 701-7711 15 Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc. 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 SAN JOSE DIVISION 20 21 RICK WOODS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 11-cv-1263-EJD (HRL) REVISED JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT GOOGLE INC., Defendant. Date: Time: Place: Judge: August 20, 2015 9:00 a.m. Courtroom 4, 5th Floor Hon. Edward J. Davila 27 28 REVISED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO. 11-CV-1263-EJD (HRL) 1 2 Plaintiff Rick Woods (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Google Inc. (“Google”), by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate as follows: 3 WHEREAS, on April 23, 2015, Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment; 4 WHEREAS, on May 6, 2015, the Court entered an order granting the parties’ prior 5 6 stipulation to an extended briefing schedule; WHEREAS, pursuant to that order, Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for 7 Summary Judgment would be filed on or before June 30, 2015 and Defendant’s Reply in Support 8 of Summary Judgment would be filed on or before August 4, 2015; and 9 10 11 12 WHEREAS the parties wish to slightly adjust the briefing schedule now that certain additional depositions have been scheduled. The parties hereby jointly request that the Court enter the following schedule for briefing of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; 13 1. Plaintiff’s Opposition will be filed on or before July 10, 2015; and 14 2. Defendant’s Reply will be filed on or before August 6, 2015. 15 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 16 Dated: May 28, 2015 17 MAYER BROWN LLP By: /s/ Edward D. Johnson 18 Edward D. Johnson 19 Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc. 20 Dated: May 28, 2015 KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK, LLP 21 22 By: /s/ Matthew L. Mustokoff 23 Matthew L. Mustokoff 24 Dated: May 28, 2015 NIX, PATTERSON & ROACH, LLP 25 By: /s/ Brad E. Seidel 26 Brad E. Seidel 27 Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel 1 28 REVISED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO. 11-CV-1263-EJD (HRL) 716272261 1 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED AS STIPULATED Dated: ______________________________ 5/29/2015 _______________________________ Hon. Edward J. Davila U.S. District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- 1 2 3 I affirm that Matthew L. Mustokoff and Brad E. Seidel have consented to the electronic filing of this document on Plaintiff’s behalf. Dated: May 28, 2015 MAYER BROWN LLP 4 By: /s/ Edward D. Johnson 5 Edward D. Johnson 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?