Woods v. Google, Inc.

Filing 260

ORDER GRANTING 257 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO CLARIFY SCHEDULING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/20/2017. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2017)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 5 RICK WOODS, Case No. 5:11-cv-01263-EJD Plaintiff, 6 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO CLARIFY SCHEDULING ORDERS v. 7 8 GOOGLE LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 257 Defendant. 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 This Court issued a pretrial order on August 19, 2014. Dkt. No. 177. This Court issued a revised scheduling order on August 12, 2015. Dkt. No. 241. On May 3, 2016, this Court ordered that the deadlines in the pretrial order at Dkt. No. 177 13 (but not in the order at Dkt. 241) were vacated and would be reset after the Court issued an order 14 on Defendant’s pending summary judgment motion. Dkt. No. 252. This Court issued an order on 15 the summary judgment motion on September 28, 2017. Dkt. No. 253. 16 Plaintiff interprets the Court’s previous orders to mean that the schedule in the August 12, 17 2015 order (Dkt. No. 241) remains in effect. Dkt. No. 259. Defendant believes that all deadlines 18 have been vacated. Dkt. No. 257. 19 The Court orders that all pretrial and trial dates in the Court’s previous scheduling orders 20 (including Dkt. Nos. 177 and 241) are vacated. Per Dkt. No. 254, a case management conference 21 is set for December 7, 2017. The parties shall propose a new schedule in their joint case 22 management statement. 23 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 20, 2017 ______________________________________ EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 27 28 Case No.: 5:11-cv-01263-EJD ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO CLARIFY SCHEDULING ORDERS 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?