Remus v. FIOS, Inc

Filing 14

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS re 8 , Case referred to early neutral evaluation. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 6/8/11. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2011)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

-----CASE NO. 11-CV-01264-HRL JF

JOHN REMUS,
Plaintiff(s),

----------------STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

v.
FIOS, INC., and DOES 1-10,
inclusive
Defendant(s).
/

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
Private ADR (please identify process and provider)

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
other requested deadline

Dated: May 24, 2011

Dated: May 24, 2011

/s/ John McBride
Attorney for Plaintiff
John Remus
/s/ Karin M. Cogbill
Attorney for Defendant
Fios, Inc.
American LegalNet, Inc.
www.USCourtForms.com

------------------ ORDER
[PROPOSED]
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:
Non-binding Arbitration
X
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
Mediation
Private ADR
Deadline for ADR session
X
90 days from the date of this order.
other

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 6/8/11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

American LegalNet, Inc.
www.USCourtForms.com