Mulesoft, Inc v. Business Integration Technology, Inc

Filing 21

ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 9/6/2011. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2011)

Download PDF
Case5:11-cv-01317-LHK Document20 1 2 3 4 5 6 Filed09/02/11 Page1 of 3 CLAASSEN, Professional Corporation John Claassen, Esq. (212954) 1999 Harrison, Suite 2210 Oakland, CA 94612 Tel.: (510) 251-8010 Fax: (510) 868-3398 john@claassenlegal.com Attorney for Plaintiff MULESOFT, INC. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MULESOFT, INC., a Delaware corporation Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 v. BUSINESS INTEGRATION TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Missouri Corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, Defendants. 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: CV11-01317 LHK STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE -1- No. CV11-01317 LHK Case5:11-cv-01317-LHK Document20 Filed09/02/11 Page2 of 3 1 STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING 2 ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE 3 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), plaintiff MuleSoft, Inc. and 4 defendant Business Integration Technology, Inc. hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of this 5 Court, that this action is dismissed in its entirety without prejudice. Each party shall bear its own 6 costs and attorney fees. 7 8 Respectfully submitted, Dated: September 2, 2011 CLAASSEN, Professional Corporation /s/ 9 By:____________________________ John Claassen, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff MULESOFT, INC. 10 11 12 Dated: September 1, 2011 WILSON, ELSER LLP 13 /s/ 14 By:____________________________ Francis Torrence, Esq. Attorney for Defendant BUSINESS INTEGRATION TECHNOLOGY, INC. 15 16 17 Dated: Sept. 6, ________, 2011 18 19 By:____________________________ Hon. Lucy H. Koh UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED & [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE -2- No. CV11-01317 LHK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?