Mulesoft, Inc v. Business Integration Technology, Inc
Filing
21
ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 9/6/2011. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2011)
Case5:11-cv-01317-LHK Document20
1
2
3
4
5
6
Filed09/02/11 Page1 of 3
CLAASSEN, Professional Corporation
John Claassen, Esq. (212954)
1999 Harrison, Suite 2210
Oakland, CA 94612
Tel.: (510) 251-8010
Fax: (510) 868-3398
john@claassenlegal.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
MULESOFT, INC.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MULESOFT, INC., a Delaware corporation
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
v.
BUSINESS INTEGRATION TECHNOLOGY,
INC., a Missouri Corporation, and DOES 1
through 10,
Defendants.
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.: CV11-01317 LHK
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED]
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER
DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
-1-
No. CV11-01317 LHK
Case5:11-cv-01317-LHK Document20
Filed09/02/11 Page2 of 3
1
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING
2
ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
3
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), plaintiff MuleSoft, Inc. and
4
defendant Business Integration Technology, Inc. hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of this
5
Court, that this action is dismissed in its entirety without prejudice. Each party shall bear its own
6
costs and attorney fees.
7
8
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: September 2, 2011
CLAASSEN, Professional Corporation
/s/
9
By:____________________________
John Claassen, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff
MULESOFT, INC.
10
11
12
Dated: September 1, 2011
WILSON, ELSER LLP
13
/s/
14
By:____________________________
Francis Torrence, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
BUSINESS INTEGRATION
TECHNOLOGY, INC.
15
16
17
Dated: Sept. 6,
________, 2011
18
19
By:____________________________
Hon. Lucy H. Koh
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED & [PROPOSED] ORDER
DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE
-2-
No. CV11-01317 LHK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?