Shia Association of Bay Area, Inc., et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al

Filing 13

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND SETTING MOTION HEARING ON 5/6/2011 AT 09:00 AM re 8 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 4/11/11. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Marc Van Der Hout, California Bar No. 80778 Stacey L. Gartland, California Bar No.184694 Van Der Hout, Brigagliano & Nightingale, LLP 180 Sutter Street, Fifth Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 981-3000 Facsimile: (415) 981-3003 Email: ndca@vblaw.com 5 6 Attorneys for Petitioners 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE 8 9 10 11 12 Shia Association of Bay Area, Inc., Nabi Raza Mir, Syeda Gulshan Zahera , A.R.M1., A.R.M2., A.R.M3., A.R.M4., and A.R.M5. Plaintiffs, v. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 No. 11-01369 JF ----------------- ORDER GRANTING [PROPOSED] STIPULATED BRIEFING and HEARING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Immigration Case, Mandamus, United States of America, Administrative Procedure Act Janet NAPOLITANO, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security; Alejandro MAYORKAS, Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Before Honorable Jeremy Fogel Services; Rosemary Langley Melville, Director of the USCIS California Service Center; Eric HOLDER, Attorney General, Department of Justice; Carol Keller, Field Office Director, San Jose, California, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; Hilary CLINTON, Secretary of State; Perry, Rhew, Director of the USCIS Administrative Appeals Office; David V. AGUILAR, Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection Defendants. 22 23 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED BRIEFING and HEARING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 1 Case No. 11-01369 JF 1 2 3 This Court, having reviewed the Stipulated Briefing and Hearing Schedule on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction, HEREBY ORDERS THE FOLLOWING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE: 4 5 6 1) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction Due: April 8, 2011 8 2) Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction Due: April 15, 2011 3) Plaintiffs’ Reply to Defendants’ Response Due: April 27, 2011 4) Hearing on Motion for Preliminary Injunction Due: 7 May 6, 2011 9 10 11 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 4/11/11 Dated: _________ ____________________________ Honorable Jeremy Fogel United States District Court 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED BRIEFING and HEARING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 2 Case No. 11-01369 JF CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 I, Marc Van Der Hout, the undersigned, say: 3 I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within action or proceedings; 4 my business address is Van Der Hout, Brigagliano & Nightingale, LLP, 180 Sutter Street, Fifth 5 Floor, San Francisco, CA 94104. 6 On April 6, 2011, I caused to be served on opposing counsel the within: 7 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED BRIEFING and HEARING SCHEDULE 8 9 10 ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION with the Clerk of Court for the United States District Court for the Northern District of California by using the appellate CM/ECF system. 11 12 I certify that Melissa Leibman, of the Office Immigration Litigation, who has entered her 13 appearance on behalf of all defendants named in this case, is a registered CM/ECF user and that 14 service will be accomplished by the appellate CM/ECF system. 15 16 /s/ Marc Van Der Hout 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED BRIEFING and HEARING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 3 Case No. 11-01369 JF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?