Wang v. OCZ Technology Group, Inc

Filing 28

ORDER Approving 22 Stipulation Extending Briefing Schedule and Time for Parties To Exchange Initial Disclosures. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on June 17, 2011. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2011)

1
2
3
4

Laurence M. Rosen (SBN # 219683)
THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A.
333 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

5
Counsel for Plaintiff James Wang
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION

7
8
9
10

JAMES WANG, INDIVIDUALLY AND
ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS
SIMILARLY SITUATED,

11
Plaintiff,

12
vs.

13
14

OCZ TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.,

15

Defendants.

16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.

CV 11-01415-PSG

STIPULATION AND
ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND TIME FOR
PARTIES TO EXCHANGE INITIAL
DISCLOSURES
Hon. Paul S. Grewal

17
18
19
20
21
22
23

WHEREAS, on May 18, 2011 defendant OCZ Technology Group, Inc. (“OCZ”)
filed a motion to dismiss the complaint or in the alternative to strike certain allegations in
the complaint (the “Motion”), noticing a hearing date of August 2, 2011 at 10 a.m.
(docket no. 16);
WHEREAS, pursuant to the parties’ April 14, 2011 stipulation, Plaintiff’s
opposition to the Motion is due on or by June 17, 2011, and OCZ’s reply thereto is due
on or by July 1, 2011 (docket no. 7);

24
WHEREAS, the deadline for parties to exchange initial disclosures is June 14,
25
2011 (docket no. 5);
26
27
28

1
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
AND TIME FOR PARTIES TO EXCHANGE INITIAL DISCLOSURES
Case no. CV 11-01415-PSG

WHEREAS, OCZ has raised a number of complex issues in their Motion and

1
2

Plaintiff’s counsel requires additional time to respond;
WHEREAS, the parties require additional time to prepare their initial disclosures

3
4

due to the complex nature of this putative class action; and
WHEREAS, the parties believe that the requested adjustments will not cause

5
6

undue delay and will promote the orderly and efficient progress of the action;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED among the undersigned parties

7
8
9
10

that:
The current schedule should be adjusted as follows:
•

alternative to strike will be due on or by July 5, 2011;

11
12

•

15
16

Defendant’s reply in further support of its motion to dismiss or in the
alternative to strike will be due on or by July 19, 2011; and

13
14

Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss or in the

•

Parties shall exchange initial disclosures on or by June 24, 2011.

SO STIPULATED
Dated: June 13, 2011

THE HINTON LAW FIRM

17
18
19

By:
/s/ Christopher S. Hinton
Christopher S. Hinton

20

And

21

THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A.
LAURENCE M. ROSEN (SBN # 219683)
PHILLIP KIM

22
23
24

Counsel for Plaintiff James Wang

25
26
27
28

2
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
AND TIME FOR PARTIES TO EXCHANGE INITIAL DISCLOSURES
Case no. CV 11-01415-PSG

1
2
3
4

Dated: June 13, 2010

MAYER BROWN LLP
NEIL M. SOLTMAN
MATTHEW H. MARMOLEJO
RUTH ZADIKANY

5
6
7

By: /s/ Matthew H. Marmolejo (authorized 6/13/2011)
Matthew H. Marmolejo
Counsel for Defendant OCZ Technology Group, Inc.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
AND TIME FOR PARTIES TO EXCHANGE INITIAL DISCLOSURES
Case no. CV 11-01415-PSG

ORDER

1
2
3
4

Pursuant to stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED THAT:
1.

Plaintiff shall file its opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss or in the

5

alternative to strike on or by July 5, 2011, and Defendant shall file its reply, if

6

any, on or by July 19, 2011; and

7

2. The parties shall exchange their initial disclosures by June 24, 2011.

8
9

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11
12
13

DATED: June 17, 2011
HON. PAUL S. GREWAL
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

4
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
AND TIME FOR PARTIES TO EXCHANGE INITIAL DISCLOSURES
Case no. CV 11-01415-PSG