Low v. Linkedin Corporation
Filing
33
ORDER re 30 Stipulation filed by Kevin Low. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 12/5/2011. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2011)
1 REESE RICHMAN LLP
Michael R. Reese (Cal. Bar No. 206773)
2 Kim E. Richman
875 Avenue of the Ameircas, 18th Floor
3 New York, NY 10001
Telephone: (212) 643-0500
4 Facsimile: (212) 253-4272
Email: mreese@reeserichman.com
5
kirchman@reeseirchman.com
6
- and 7
MILBERG LLP
8 Sanford P. Dumain
Peter E. Seidman (pro hac vice)
9 Melissa Ryan Clark (pro hac vice)
Charles Slidders
10 One Pennsylvania Plaza, 49th Floor
New York, NY 10119
11 Telephone: (212) 594-5300
Facsimile: (212) 868-1229
12 Email: sdumain@milberg.com
pseidman@milberg.com
13
mclark@milberg.com
cslidders@milberg.com
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff Kevin Low
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
(SAN JOSE DIVISION)
17
18 KEVIN LOW, individually and on behalf of ) CASE NO. CV 11-01468 (LHK)
)
all others similarly situated,
) JOINT STIPULATION SETTING A
19
Plaintiff,
) BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION
) TO DISMISS AND ADJOURNING
20
) DECEMBER 14, 2011, CASE
v.
) MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
21
LINKEDIN CORPORATION, a California
)
)
22 Corporation,
)
)
Defendant.
23
)
24
25
26
27
28
1
WHEREAS, Defendant LinkedIn Corporation's motion to dismiss Plaintiff s initial
2 complaint was heard by the Court on September 15, 2011;
3
WHEREAS, on November 11, 2011, the Court entered an order granting Defendant's
4 motion to dismiss and providing Plaintiff 21 days from the filing of that order to file a first
5 amended complaint;
6
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court's November 11, 2011 order, Plaintiff has until
7 December 2, 2011 to file a first amended complaint;
8
WHEREAS, there is currently a case management conference scheduled in this action for
9 December 14, 2011;
10
WHEREAS, the Court indicated at the September 15, 2011 motion to dismiss hearing
11 that, if Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the first amended complaint, the Court would likely
12 move the December 14, 2011 case management conference to the date of the hearing on that
13 motion;
14
WHEREAS, Defendant anticipates that it will file a motion to dismiss and the parties
15 have agreed to a briefing schedule for that motion;
16
WHEREAS, the Court's courtroom deputy has informed the parties that the next
17 available date for a hearing on the motion to dismiss is March 22, 2012;
18
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by the parties,
19 through their undersigned counsel, that:
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Defendant's motion to dismiss the first amended complaint will be filed by
January 9, 2012;
Plaintiff s opposition to Defendant's motion to dismiss will be filed by
February 2, 2012;
Defendant's reply in further support of its motion to dismiss will be filed by
February 17, 2012;
The hearing on the motion to dismiss will be held on March 22, 2012, at 1:30
p.m.; and
The case management conference currently scheduled for December 14, 2011,
will be adjourned until March 22, 2012, at 1:30 p.m.
28
JOINT STIPULATION
- 1-
1 Dated: December 2, 2011
Respectfully Submitted,
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
/s/ Peter E. Seidman
MILBERG LLP
Sanford P. Dumain
Peter E. Seidman (pro hac vice)
Melissa Ryan Clark (pro hac vice)
Charles Slidders
One Pennsylvania Plaza, 49th Floor
New York, New York 10119
Telephone:
(212) 594-5300
Facsimile:
(212) 868-1229
Email: sdumain@milberg.com
pseidman@milberg.com
10
Attorneys for Defendant
-and-
11
/s/ Simon J. Frankel
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
Simon J. Frankel
Mali Friedman
One Front Street
San Francisco CA 94111
Telephone:
(415) 591-7052
Facsimile:
(415) 955-6552
Email: sfrankel@cov.com
REESE RICHMAN LLP
Michael R. Reese (Cal. Bar No. 206773)
Kim E. Richman
875 Avenue of the Americas, 18 th Floor
New York, New York 10001
Telephone: (212) 643-0500
12
13
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff
15
16 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18 Dated: December 5, 2011
By:
Honorable Lucy H. Koh
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?