Low v. Linkedin Corporation

Filing 33

ORDER re 30 Stipulation filed by Kevin Low. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 12/5/2011. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2011)

Download PDF
1 REESE RICHMAN LLP Michael R. Reese (Cal. Bar No. 206773) 2 Kim E. Richman 875 Avenue of the Ameircas, 18th Floor 3 New York, NY 10001 Telephone: (212) 643-0500 4 Facsimile: (212) 253-4272 Email: mreese@reeserichman.com 5 kirchman@reeseirchman.com 6 - and 7 MILBERG LLP 8 Sanford P. Dumain Peter E. Seidman (pro hac vice) 9 Melissa Ryan Clark (pro hac vice) Charles Slidders 10 One Pennsylvania Plaza, 49th Floor New York, NY 10119 11 Telephone: (212) 594-5300 Facsimile: (212) 868-1229 12 Email: sdumain@milberg.com pseidman@milberg.com 13 mclark@milberg.com cslidders@milberg.com 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff Kevin Low 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN JOSE DIVISION) 17 18 KEVIN LOW, individually and on behalf of ) CASE NO. CV 11-01468 (LHK) ) all others similarly situated, ) JOINT STIPULATION SETTING A 19 Plaintiff, ) BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION ) TO DISMISS AND ADJOURNING 20 ) DECEMBER 14, 2011, CASE v. ) MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 21 LINKEDIN CORPORATION, a California ) ) 22 Corporation, ) ) Defendant. 23 ) 24 25 26 27 28 1 WHEREAS, Defendant LinkedIn Corporation's motion to dismiss Plaintiff s initial 2 complaint was heard by the Court on September 15, 2011; 3 WHEREAS, on November 11, 2011, the Court entered an order granting Defendant's 4 motion to dismiss and providing Plaintiff 21 days from the filing of that order to file a first 5 amended complaint; 6 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court's November 11, 2011 order, Plaintiff has until 7 December 2, 2011 to file a first amended complaint; 8 WHEREAS, there is currently a case management conference scheduled in this action for 9 December 14, 2011; 10 WHEREAS, the Court indicated at the September 15, 2011 motion to dismiss hearing 11 that, if Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the first amended complaint, the Court would likely 12 move the December 14, 2011 case management conference to the date of the hearing on that 13 motion; 14 WHEREAS, Defendant anticipates that it will file a motion to dismiss and the parties 15 have agreed to a briefing schedule for that motion; 16 WHEREAS, the Court's courtroom deputy has informed the parties that the next 17 available date for a hearing on the motion to dismiss is March 22, 2012; 18 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by the parties, 19 through their undersigned counsel, that: 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Defendant's motion to dismiss the first amended complaint will be filed by January 9, 2012; Plaintiff s opposition to Defendant's motion to dismiss will be filed by February 2, 2012; Defendant's reply in further support of its motion to dismiss will be filed by February 17, 2012; The hearing on the motion to dismiss will be held on March 22, 2012, at 1:30 p.m.; and The case management conference currently scheduled for December 14, 2011, will be adjourned until March 22, 2012, at 1:30 p.m. 28 JOINT STIPULATION - 1- 1 Dated: December 2, 2011 Respectfully Submitted, 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 /s/ Peter E. Seidman MILBERG LLP Sanford P. Dumain Peter E. Seidman (pro hac vice) Melissa Ryan Clark (pro hac vice) Charles Slidders One Pennsylvania Plaza, 49th Floor New York, New York 10119 Telephone: (212) 594-5300 Facsimile: (212) 868-1229 Email: sdumain@milberg.com pseidman@milberg.com 10 Attorneys for Defendant -and- 11 /s/ Simon J. Frankel COVINGTON & BURLING LLP Simon J. Frankel Mali Friedman One Front Street San Francisco CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 591-7052 Facsimile: (415) 955-6552 Email: sfrankel@cov.com REESE RICHMAN LLP Michael R. Reese (Cal. Bar No. 206773) Kim E. Richman 875 Avenue of the Americas, 18 th Floor New York, New York 10001 Telephone: (212) 643-0500 12 13 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff 15 16 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 Dated: December 5, 2011 By: Honorable Lucy H. Koh 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?