Luu v. Allstate Insurance Company
Filing
27
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Early Neutral Evaluation re 26 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/1/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2011)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TOM LUU
Plaintiff(s),
CASE NO. 5:11-CV-01523 EJD
v.
ALLSTATE INSURANCE
COMPANY and DOES 1 through
50, inclusive
Defendant(s).
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
Private ADR (please identify process and provider)
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
other requested deadline
Dated: October 31, 2011
/s/ John Watson
Attorney for Plaintiff
TOM LUU
Dated: October 31, 2011
/s/ Megan Barker
Attorney for Defendant
ALLSTATE INSURANCE
COMPANY
American LegalNet, Inc.
www.USCourtForms.com
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:
Non-binding Arbitration
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
Mediation
Private ADR
Deadline for ADR session
90 days from the date of this order.
other
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 1, 2011
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Hon. Edward J. Davila
American LegalNet, Inc.
www.USCourtForms.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?