Goette v. Siemens Venture Capital et al

Filing 15

ORDER Requiring Parties to File Stipulation of Dismissal or Joint Case Management Statement by 1:00 p.m., Friday, September 2, 2011. Signed by Judge Koh on 9/1/2011. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

GERD GOETTE,
Plaintiff,
v.
SIEMENS VENTURE CAPITAL, ET AL.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 11-CV-01631-LHK
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO
FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
OR JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT
STATEMENT

On July 13, 2011, the parties filed a Notice of Settlement, informing the Court that the case

18

has settled. See Dkt. #13. The parties represented to the Court that they expected to finalize the

19

settlement terms, pay the settlement amount, and file a stipulation of dismissal by August 26, 2011.

20

In light of the settlement and the parties’ express representations, the Court granted the

21

parties’ request to continue the July 20, 2011 case management conference to September 7, 2011.

22

See July 14, 2011 Order, Dkt. #14. In its July 14, 2011 Order, the Court stated: “If the parties file a

23

stipulation of dismissal as anticipated, the Court will vacate the September 7, 2011 case

24

management conference. If the parties do not finalize the settlement, the parties must file a case

25

management statement by August 31, 2011 and should expect to litigate the case on an expedited

26

basis.” See id. at 1-2. As of the date of this Order, the parties have not filed a stipulation of

27

dismissal. In violation of this Court’s July 14, 2011 Order and Civil Local Rule 16-10, the parties

28

have also not filed a joint case management statement.
1
Case No.: 11-CV-01631-LHK
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO FILE JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT

1

Accordingly, by 1:00 p.m., Friday, September 2, 2011, the parties must file either: (1) a

2

stipulation of dismissal; or (2) a joint case management statement, which shall include an

3

explanation for their delay and an expedited case schedule.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

Dated: September 1, 2011

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 11-CV-01631-LHK
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO FILE JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT