Boyd v. Accuray, Inc

Filing 63

Amended ORDER re #51 . Opposition due by 5/7/2012. Reply due by 5/16/2012. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 5/4/2012. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2012)

Case5:11-cv-01644-LHK Document60-3 Filed05/04/12 Page1 of 13
Case5:11-cv-01644-LHK Document61 Filed05/03/12 Page1 of

MEIR J. WESTREICH [CSBN 73133]
Attorney at Law
2 221 East Walnut, Suite 200
Pasadena, California 91101
3 626-440-9906 / FAX: [phone]
1

4

Attorney for Plaintiff

5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHER DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12

MICHAEL E. BOYD,

13

Plaintiff,

14

v.

15

ACCURAY, INC.; DOES 1 - 50,

16

Defendants.

17
18
19

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. CV 11-01644 LKH
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
APPLICATION TO FURTHER
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Motion Hearing Date: May 24, 2012
Time: 1:30 p.m.
Courtroom No. 8
AMENDED ORDER

20

Plaintiff having applied to the Court for a further enlargement of time to

21

respond to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment from May 3, 2012 to May 7,

22

May 14,
2012, with Defendant’s time to file any reply to May16 2012, and good cause

23

showing therefor
IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

Dated: May 4, 2012

25
26
UNIT
ED

_____________________________
Judge of the District Court

RT
U
O

S

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
27
RED

DE
28 IS SO ORIFIED
IT
D

Ko h

A

H

LI

RT

ER

ucy H.

FO

NO

Judge L

R NIA

AS MO

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

1

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENSE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION