TEK Global S.R.L. v. Sealant Systems International, Inc.
Filing
34
ORDER GRANTING PRIVILEGES REGARDING EQUIPMENT, granting 32 Proposed Order filed by Sealant Systems International, Inc. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 5/2/2012. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP
STANLEY M. GIBSON (Bar No. 162329), sgibson@jmbm.com
GREGORY S. CORDREY (Bar No. 190144), gcordrey@jmbm.com
1900 Avenue of the Stars, Seventh Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: (310) 203-8080
Facsimile: (310) 203-0567
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
SEALANT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL INC.
ACCESSORIES MARKETING, INC.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
SEALANT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL
INC., AND ACCESSORIES MARKETING,
INC.
14
CASE NO.
11-cv-774-PSG (Lead case)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PRIVILEGES REGARDING EQUIPMENT
Plaintiffs,
(Consolidated with Case No. 11-cv-1649)
15
16
v.
TEK GLOBAL S.R.L., and TEK Corporation,
17
Defendants.
Date:
May 2, 2012
Time:
10:00 a.m.
Location: 280 South 1st Street
Courtroom 5, 4th Floor
Judge:
Hon. Paul Singh Grewal
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PRINTED ON
29
RECYCLED PAPER
LA 8732136v1
Case No. CV 11-774-PSG
ORDER GRANTING PRIVILEGES RE EQUIPMENT
IT IS ORDERED that Stanley M. Gibson and Gregory S. Cordrey, counsel for Plaintiffs
1
2
Sealant Systems International, Inc. and Accessories Marketing, Inc., may bring into the Court on
3
Wednesday, May 2, 2012, and remove from the Court on May 2, 2012, the following equipment:
4
1.
Two (2) lap-top computers;
5
2.
One (1) overhead projector; and
6
3.
Two (2) exemplar tire repair kits.
7
8
Dated:
______________________________________
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States District Court Magistrate Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PRINTED ON
-1-
29
RECYCLED PAPER
LA 8732136v1
Case No. CV 11-774-PSG
ORDER GRANTING PRIVILEGES RE EQUIPMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?