TEK Global S.R.L. v. Sealant Systems International, Inc.

Filing 34

ORDER GRANTING PRIVILEGES REGARDING EQUIPMENT, granting 32 Proposed Order filed by Sealant Systems International, Inc. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 5/2/2012. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP STANLEY M. GIBSON (Bar No. 162329), sgibson@jmbm.com GREGORY S. CORDREY (Bar No. 190144), gcordrey@jmbm.com 1900 Avenue of the Stars, Seventh Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (310) 203-8080 Facsimile: (310) 203-0567 Attorneys for Plaintiffs SEALANT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL INC. ACCESSORIES MARKETING, INC. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 13 SEALANT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL INC., AND ACCESSORIES MARKETING, INC. 14 CASE NO. 11-cv-774-PSG (Lead case) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PRIVILEGES REGARDING EQUIPMENT Plaintiffs, (Consolidated with Case No. 11-cv-1649) 15 16 v. TEK GLOBAL S.R.L., and TEK Corporation, 17 Defendants. Date: May 2, 2012 Time: 10:00 a.m. Location: 280 South 1st Street Courtroom 5, 4th Floor Judge: Hon. Paul Singh Grewal 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PRINTED ON 29 RECYCLED PAPER LA 8732136v1 Case No. CV 11-774-PSG ORDER GRANTING PRIVILEGES RE EQUIPMENT IT IS ORDERED that Stanley M. Gibson and Gregory S. Cordrey, counsel for Plaintiffs 1 2 Sealant Systems International, Inc. and Accessories Marketing, Inc., may bring into the Court on 3 Wednesday, May 2, 2012, and remove from the Court on May 2, 2012, the following equipment: 4 1. Two (2) lap-top computers; 5 2. One (1) overhead projector; and 6 3. Two (2) exemplar tire repair kits. 7 8 Dated: ______________________________________ PAUL S. GREWAL United States District Court Magistrate Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PRINTED ON -1- 29 RECYCLED PAPER LA 8732136v1 Case No. CV 11-774-PSG ORDER GRANTING PRIVILEGES RE EQUIPMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?