UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. One 2006 Cirrus SR20 Airplane

Filing 24

ORDER GRANTING STAY re 23 Joint Case Management Statement filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. The stay of the case is continued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(g) until after the resolution of the related criminal prosecution or further order o f the court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file joint status updates on March 27, 2012 and every six months thereafter. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall notify the court when the criminal action is resolved and request a case management conference. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on January 18, 2012. (ejdlc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2012) Modified text on 1/18/2012 (ecg, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 15 ONE 2006 CIRRUS SR20 AIRPLANE FAA# N9255, SER. #1651 AND APPROXIMATELY $4,400 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 16 Defendants. 14 17 18 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 5: 11-CV-01724 EJD ORDER GRANTING STAY (Re: Docket No. 23) On January 10, 2012, parties filed a Joint Case Management Conference Statement requesting the stay of the instant case. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stay of the case is continued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ยง 20 981(g) until after the resolution of the related criminal prosecution or further order of the court. 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file joint status updates on March 27, 22 23 2012 and every six months thereafter. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall notify the court when the criminal action 24 is resolved and request a case management conference. 25 Dated: January 18, 2012 26 _________________________________ EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 27 28 Case No.: 5: 11-CV-01724 EJD ORDER GRANTING STAY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?