Meguerian v. Apple, Inc

Filing 59

STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Request to Enlarge Time to file Reply Brief re 58 Stipulation. Apple's Reply Brief in support of the Motion to Stay Discovery is extended to 12/5/2011. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/29/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS (CA SBN 87607)
[e-mail]
STUART C. PLUNKETT (CA SBN 187971)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.268.7522
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17

IN RE APPLE IN-APP PURCHASE
LITIGATION

Master File No. 11-CV-1758-EJD

This Document Relates to:

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO
FILE REPLY BRIEF

All Actions

CLASS ACTION

Judge: Honorable Edward J. Davila

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO FILE REPLY
MASTER FILE NO. 11-CV-1758-EJD
sf-3075401

1
2

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) hereby submits this
Stipulated Request for Order Enlarging Time to File Reply Brief.

3
4

WHEREAS, on November 14, 2011, Apple filed a Motion to Stay Discovery and noticed
the motion for hearing on February 17, 2012;

5

WHEREAS plaintiffs’ opposition to the motion was due November 28, 2011;

6

WHEREAS plaintiffs filed their opposition brief a few days early, on November 23, 2011;

7

WHEREAS Apple’s reply brief is now due November 30, 2011;

8

WHEREAS the seven-day reply period generated by the filing date of the opposition

9

includes the Thanksgiving holiday;

10

WHEREAS certain attorneys for Apple are on vacation over the Thanksgiving holiday;

11

WHEREAS Apple requested that plaintiffs stipulate to extend Apple’s time to file a reply

12

brief to December 5, 2011;

13

WHEREAS the Court has not previously entered an order modifying time in this action;

14

WHEREAS the parties have previously stipulated to extend Apple’s time to respond to the

15

complaints in the individual action (prior to consolidation in this proceeding);

16
17
18
19
20

WHEREAS the requested time modification would not affect any schedule set by the
Court;
THEREFORE, plaintiffs and Apple stipulate that Apple’s time to file its reply brief in
support of the motion to stay discovery should be extended to December 5, 2011.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO FILE REPLY
MASTER FILE NO. 11-CV-1758-EJD
sf-3075401

1

1

Dated: November 28, 2011

2

PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS
STUART C. PLUNKETT
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

3
4

By:

5

Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

6
7

/s/ Stuart C. Plunkett
STUART C. PLUNKETT

Dated: November 28, 2011

8

MICHAEL J. BONI
JOSHUA D. SNYDER
BONI & ZACK LLC

9
10

By:

11

/s/ Joshua D. Snyder
JOSHUA D. SNYDER
Admitted Pro Hac Vice

12

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

13
14
15

GENERAL ORDER 45 ATTESTATION

16

I, Kay Fitz-Patrick, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file the

17

foregoing document. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Stuart C.

18

Plunkett and Joshua D. Snyder have concurred in this filing.

19
/s/ Kay Fitz-Patrick
Kay Fitz-Patrick

20
21
22
23
24

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: November 29, 2011
_______________________________
Hon. Edward J. Davila
United States District Judge

25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO FILE REPLY
MASTER FILE NO. 11-CV-1758-EJD
sf-3075401

2