Copado et al v. Hanson & Fitch, Inc et al
Filing
22
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISMISSAL re 21 Stipulation filed by Carlos Copado, Ismael Munguia. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on November 22, 2011. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2011)
4
ADAM WANG, Bar No. 201233
ADAM PEDERSEN, Bar No. 261091
LAW OFFICES OF ADAM WANG
12 S First Street, Suite 708
San Jose, CA 95113
Tel: 408-292-1040
Fax: 408-416-0268
adamqwang@gmail.com
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
1
2
3
6
7
8
9
10
11
Brian B. Miles, Esq., SBN 191136
Joel M. Westbrook, Esq., SBN 196578
MILES & WESTBROOK
1407 Oakland Blvd., Suite 107
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: (925) 938-4500
Facsimile: (925) 938-7007
Attorneys for Defendants HANSON &
FITCH, INC. and TODD FITCH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
12
13
14
CARLOS COPADO and ISMAEL
MUNGUIA,
15
16
17
18
Plaintiffs,
Case No.: C ll-01772 PSG
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL &
ORDER THEREON
v.
HANSON & FITCH, INC., TODD FITCH,
and DOES 1 through 10,
Defendants.
19
20
Parties, through their counsel, stipulate as follows:
21
1.
Parties have reached a settlement at the mediation, fully disposing of the case.
22
2.
Parties stipulate that this case may be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice.
23
3.
Parties stipulate and request that this Court retain jurisdiction for the purpose of
24
enforcing the settlement.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Copado et al v. Hanson & Fitch. et al
1
Case No. ll-01772 PSG
1
2
Dated: November 21, 2011
By:
__/s/ADAM WANG __
ADAM Wang
Attorney for Plaintiffs
By:
/s/ BRIAN MILES
Brian Miles
Attorney for Defendants
3
4
5
Dated: November 17, 2011
6
7
8
_______________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER
9
10
Pursuant to parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
22
Dated: November __, 2011
13
By: ___________________
Paul S. Grewal
United States Magistrate Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Copado et al v. Hanson & Fitch. et al
2
Case No. ll-01772 PSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?