Fleming v. AC Square, Inc.
Filing
10
ORDER Setting Deadline for Parties Either To Consent or To Decline To Proceed before a Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on April 22, 2011. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
AC SQUARE, INC.,
)
)
Defendant.
___________________________________ )
WILLIAM FLEMING,
Case No.: C 11-01830 PSG
ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR
PARTIES TO FILE EITHER A
“CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE,” OR ELSE A “DECLINATION
TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND
REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT”
17
On April 22, 2011, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss this action, which as been assigned
18
to a magistrate judge. Accordingly,
19
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that each party is required either to file written consent to the
20
jurisdiction of the magistrate judge or to request reassignment to a district judge, no later than
21
April 29, 2011. See Civ. L.R. 73-1(a)(2). Each party shall file either a “Consent to Proceed
22
Before a United States Magistrate Judge,” or else a “Declination to Proceed Before a United States
23
Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment.” Both forms are available from the clerk of the
24
court or from the Forms (Civil) section of the court’s website at www.cand.uscourts.gov.
25
26
27
Dated: April 22, 2011
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge
28
ORDER, page 1
1
Notice of this filing was automatically mailed to counsel via the court’s Electronic Case Filing
system.
2
A copy of this filing was mailed to:
3
4
William E. Fleming
PO Box 3214
San Jose, CA 95156
5
Dated: April 22, 2011
6
7
/s/ Chambers Staff
Chambers of U.S. Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER, page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?