Mechanical Marketing, Inc v. Sixxon Precision Machinery Co, Ltd et al

Filing 70

ORDER RE MID-DEPOSITION DISPUTE. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on March 30, 2012. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
MECHANICAL MARKETING, INC.,
12
13
14
15
16

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
SIXXON PRECISION MACHINERY
)
CO., LTD., TAIWAN,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_________________________________ )

Case No.: C 11-01844 EJD (PSG)
ORDER RE MID-DEPOSITION
DISPUTE

17
18
On March 29, 2012, the parties contacted the court regarding a dispute that had arisen
19
during the deposition of certain individuals who had testified on behalf of Plaintiff Mechanical
20
Marketing, Inc. (“MMI”) in a Rule 30(b)(6) capacity and were testifying now in their individual
21
capacities. Michael G. Ackerman appeared on behalf of MMI and John D. Van Loben Sels
22
appeared on behalf of Defendant Sixxon Precision Machinery, Co., Ltd. (“Sixxon”). Based on
23
the arguments presented,
24
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that MMI’s objections to the same, or similar, questions
25
being posed to individuals testifying in both their Rule 30(b)(6) capacities and in their individual
26
27
28
Case No.: C 11-01844 EJD (PSG)
ORDER

1
2
3

capacities are overruled.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 3/30/2012
____________________________
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.: C 11-01844 EJD (PSG)
ORDER