Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1027

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Apple Inc. Apples Opposition To Samsungs Motion To Strike Expert Testimony Based On Undisclosed Facts And Theories (Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 6/1/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781) hmcelhinny@mofo.com MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) mjacobs@mofo.com JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368) jtaylor@mofo.com ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363) atucher@mofo.com RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425) rhung@mofo.com JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530) jasonbartlett@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 WILLIAM F. LEE william.lee@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 60 State Street Boston, MA 02109 Telephone: (617) 526-6000 Facsimile: (617) 526-5000 MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180) mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 950 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 858-6000 Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 10 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC. 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN JOSE DIVISION 16 17 APPLE INC., a California corporation, 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) Plaintiff, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendants. 25 26 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) sf-3153478 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE [Code Civ. Proc sec. 1010.6] 2 3 I declare that I am employed with the law firm of Morrison & Foerster LLP, whose address 4 is 425 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105-2482. I am not a party to the within cause, 5 and I am over the age of eighteen years. 6 7 8 9 10 I further declare that on May 31, 2012, I served a true and correct copy of: APPLE’S OPPOSITION TO SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO STRIKE EXPERT TESTIMONY BASED ON UNDISCLOSED FACTS AND THEORIES (Submitted Under Seal) DECLARATION OF MICHEL MAHARBIZ, PH.D. IN SUPPORT OF APPLE’S OPPOSITION TO SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO STRIKE EXPERT TESTIMONY and EXHIBITS C-D in SUPPORT THEREOF (Submitted Under Seal) 11 12 13 DECLARATION OF TERRY L. MUSIKA, CPA IN SUPPORT OF APPLE’S OPPOSITION TO SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO STRIKE EXPERT TESTIMONY BASED ON UNDISCLOSED FACTS AND THEORIES and EXHIBITS A-C in SUPPORT THEREOF (Submitted Under Seal) 14 15 16 DECLARATION OF MARC J. PERNICK IN SUPPORT OF APPLE’S OPPOSITION TO SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO STRIKE EXPERT TESTIMONY BASED ON UNDISCLOSED FACTS AND THEORIES and EXHIBITS 1-4, 5-7, 910, 13-15, 18, 20-32 in SUPPORT THEREOF (Submitted Under Seal) 17 18 by electronically mailing a true and correct copy through Morrison & Foerster LLP’s electronic 19 mail system to the e-mail address(s) set forth below, or as stated on the attached service list per 20 agreement in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure section 1010.6. 21 Charles K. Verhoeven charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com Kevin P.B. Johnson kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com Victoria F. Maroulis victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com Liv Herriot liv.herriot@wilmerhale.com 24 William H. Lee william.lee@wilmerhale.com Mark D. Selwyn mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com 25 Alexander B. Binder alex.binder@quinnemanuel.com Sara Jenkins SaraJenkins@quinnemanuel.com Sherrin Vanetta sherrinvanetta@quinnemanuel.com Joby Martin JobyMartin@quinnemanuel.com 22 23 26 27 28 sf-3153478 1 Rene Unger reneunger@quinnemanuel.com Gisele Darwish GiseleDarwish@quinnemanuel.com Peter Kovolos peter.kovolos@wilmerhale.com S. Calvin Walden calvin.walden@wilmerhale.com 2 3 4 5 6 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at San Francisco, California on May 31, 2012. 7 8 /s/ Rosamaría Barajas Rosamaría Barajas 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 sf-3153478

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?