Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1046
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company) re #1044 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Samsung's Reply In Support of Motion For Clarification of May 4, 2012 Order (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 6/5/2012)
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com
th
555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5 Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Telephone: (650) 801-5000
Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: (213) 443-3000
Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
Plaintiff,
vs.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Defendants.
02198.51855/4649774.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE________
1
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of
3 eighteen years and not a party to the within action; my business address is 55 California Street,
4 San Francisco, California.
5
On May 22, 2012, I served true copies of the documents described as
6
1. Samsung’s Reply In Support of Motion For Clarification; and
7
2. The Declaration of Dr. Jeffrey Johnson In Support of Samsung’s Reply In Support
8
of Motion For Clarification; and
3. The Declaration of Mark Tung In Support of Samsung’s Reply In Support of
9
10
Motion For Clarification, and exhibits thereto.
11
12 by emailing a link to the aforementioned documents to the interested parties in this action as
13 follows:
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Counsel for Apple, Inc.
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY
HMcElhinny@mofo.com
STEPHEN E. TAYLOR
staylor@tcolaw.com
MICHAEL A. JACOBS
MJacobs@mofo.com
STEPHEN MCG. BUNDY
sbundy@tcolaw.com
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR
JLeeTaylor@mofo.com
RICHARD S.J. HUNG
rhung@mofo.com
JOSHUA R. BENSON
jbenson@tcolaw.com
WILLIAM F. LEE
william.lee@wilmerhale.com
JASON R. BARTLETT
JasonBartlett@mofo.com
MARK D. SELWYN, ESQ.
mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com
DEOK KEUN MATTHEW AHN
dahn@mofo.com
GRANT L. KIM
gkim@mofo.com
DAVID B. BASSETT
david.bassett@wilmerhale.com
MICHAEL J. BETTINGER
mike.bettinger@klgates.com
ALISON M. TUCHER
atucher@mofo.com
28
02198.51855/4649774.1
ROBERT DONALD CULTICE
-2-
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE________
1
robert.cultice@wilmerhale.com
2
MARK D. FLANAGAN
mark.flanagan@wilmerhale.com
3
4
BRIAN LARIVEE
brian.larivee@wilmerhale.com
JEREMY WINER
jeremy.winer@wilmerhale.com
ANDREW MONACH
amonach@mofo.com
5
6
7
8
9
ESTHER KIM
ekim@mofo.com
ERIK J. OLSON
ejolson@mofo.com
RICHARD GOLDENBERG
richard.goldenberg@wilmerhale.com
VICTOR F. SOUTO
vic.souto@wilmerhale.com
MICHAEL SAJI
michael.saji@wilmerhale.com
EMILY R. WHELAN
emily.whelan@wilmerhale.com
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
BRIAN SEEVE
brian.seeve@wilmerhale.com
JAMES C. BURLING
james.burling@wilmerhale.com
ROBERT J. GUNTHER, JR.
robert.gunther@wilmerhale.com
PETER J. KOLOVOS
peter.kolovos@wilmerhale.com
Executed on June 5, 2012, at San Francisco, California.
17
18
__ /s/ Joby Martin________
JOBY MARTIN
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4649774.1
-2-
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE________
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?