Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1070
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. re #1069 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Exhibits to Trac Declaration in Support of Reply to Samsung's Motion for Summary Judgment, #1063 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Samsung's Reply in Support of Samsung's Motion for Summary Judgment (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 6/8/2012)
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com
th
555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5 Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Telephone: (650) 801-5000
Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: (213) 443-3000
Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
Plaintiff,
vs.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Defendants.
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of
3 eighteen years and not a party to the within action; my business address is 555 Twin Dolphin
4 Drive, Redwood Shores, California.
5
On June 8, 2012, I served true copies of the documents described as
6
1. Samsung's Reply In Support of Motion for Summary Judgment; and
7
2. The Declaration of Bill Trac In Support of Samsung's Reply In Support of Motion
8
for Summary Judgment, and Exhibits 1-2, 8-10, 14-18, 23-28 thereto.
9
3. The Supplemental Declaration of Adam Bogue, and Exhibits 1- 3 thereto.
10
11 by emailing a link to an FTP site containing the aforementioned documents to the interested
12 parties in this action as follows:
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Counsel for Apple, Inc.
staylor@tcolaw.com
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY
HMcElhinny@mofo.com
STEPHEN MCG. BUNDY
sbundy@tcolaw.com
MICHAEL A. JACOBS
MJacobs@mofo.com
JOSHUA R. BENSON
jbenson@tcolaw.com
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR
JLeeTaylor@mofo.com
RICHARD S.J. HUNG
rhung@mofo.com
WILLIAM F. LEE
william.lee@wilmerhale.com
JASON R. BARTLETT
JasonBartlett@mofo.com
MARK D. SELWYN, ESQ.
mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com
DEOK KEUN MATTHEW AHN
dahn@mofo.com
GRANT L. KIM
gkim@mofo.com
DAVID B. BASSETT
david.bassett@wilmerhale.com
MICHAEL J. BETTINGER
mike.bettinger@klgates.com
ALISON M. TUCHER
atucher@mofo.com
ROBERT DONALD CULTICE
robert.cultice@wilmerhale.com
27
28
02198.51855/4800784.1
STEPHEN E. TAYLOR
MARK D. FLANAGAN
-2-
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
BRIAN LARIVEE
brian.larivee@wilmerhale.com
mark.flanagan@wilmerhale.com
ANDREW MONACH
amonach@mofo.com
3
4
JEREMY WINER
jeremy.winer@wilmerhale.com
ERIK J. OLSON
ejolson@mofo.com
ESTHER KIM
ekim@mofo.com
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
VICTOR F. SOUTO
vic.souto@wilmerhale.com
RICHARD GOLDENBERG
richard.goldenberg@wilmerhale.com
EMILY R. WHELAN
emily.whelan@wilmerhale.com
MICHAEL SAJI
michael.saji@wilmerhale.com
JAMES C. BURLING
james.burling@wilmerhale.com
BRIAN SEEVE
brian.seeve@wilmerhale.com
ROBERT J. GUNTHER, JR.
robert.gunther@wilmerhale.com
12
13
PETER J. KOLOVOS
peter.kolovos@wilmerhale.com
14
15 Executed on June 8, 2012, at Redwood Shores, California.
16
17
__ /s/ Bill Trac________
Bill Trac
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4800784.1
-2-
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?