Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1124

Proposed Order re #1123 MOTION to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document re [DOCKET NO. 1121-1] Granting Apples Motion To Remove Incorrectly Filed Document [Docket No. 1121-1] by Apple Inc.. (Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 6/22/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 APPLE INC., a California corporation, 11 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE’S MOTION TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENT [DOCKET NO. 1121-1] SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE’S MOTION TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENT CASE NO. 11-CV-01846 LHK (PSG) sf-3162809 1 Apple has moved this Court to remove incorrectly filed Docket No. 1121-1, which 2 contains information that has been designated as confidential under the protective order. Apple 3 has filed a motion to seal this document and anticipates that Samsung or third party MERL will 4 submit a declaration and proposed sealing order pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(d). 5 6 7 8 9 Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, and finding good cause therefor, The Court hereby grants Apple’s Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document [Docket No. 1121-1] and orders that it be removed from the publicly available docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 13 Dated: ___________________, 2012 HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE’S MOTION TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENT CASE NO. 11-CV-01846 LHK (PSG) sf-3162809

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?