Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 113

Proposed Order re #111 regarding APPLE'S MOTION FOR EXPEDITED TRIAL ON ITS CLAIMS AND FOR EARLY CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 7/15/2011) Modified on 7/20/2011 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
 [e-mail]
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
 Facsimile: [phone]
 Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
[e-mail]
 Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
[e-mail]
th
 555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5 Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
 [e-mail]
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
 Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: [phone]
 Facsimile: [phone]
 Attorneys for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.,
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and
 Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION




APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,




vs.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,


CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
APPLE’S MOTION FOR EXPEDITED
TRIAL ON ITS CLAIMS AND FOR
EARLY CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE

Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge

Defendants.






Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION FOR EXPEDITED TRIAL ON ITS CLAIMS AND
FOR EARLY CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Having considered Apple Inc.’s (“Apple’s”) Motion For Expedited Trial On Its Claims

3 And For Early Case Management Conference (the “Motion”) (D.N. 83), the declaration cited
4 therein, and all pleadings and other papers in support thereof; and the Opposition filed by
5 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung
6 Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively “Samsung”), the declaration cited therein, and
7 all pleadings and other papers in support thereof; the Court concludes that good cause does not
8 exist for Apple’s Motion. The Court therefore DENIES Apple’s Motion.
9
10 IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
13 DATED: _________ , 2011

______________________________________

14

LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION FOR EXPEDITED TRIAL ON ITS CLAIMS AND
FOR EARLY CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

-1-