Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1133
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company) re #1132 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 6/26/2012)
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com
th
555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5 Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Telephone: (650) 801-5000
Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: (213) 443-3000
Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
Plaintiff,
vs.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Defendants.
02198.51855/4649774.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE________
1
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of
3 eighteen years and not a party to the within action; my business address is 55 California Street,
4 San Francisco, California.
5
On June 26, 2012, I served true copies of the documents described as
1. Samsung’s Motion For Leave to Seek Reconsideration of the Court’s June 25, 2012
6
7
Order; and
8
2. The Declaration of Thomas Watson In Support of Samsung’s Motion For Leave to
9
Seek Reconsideration of the Court’s June 25, 2012 Order, and exhibits thereto.
10
11 by emailing a link to the aforementioned documents to the interested parties in this action as
12 follows:
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Counsel for Apple, Inc.
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY
HMcElhinny@mofo.com
staylor@tcolaw.com
STEPHEN MCG. BUNDY
sbundy@tcolaw.com
MICHAEL A. JACOBS
MJacobs@mofo.com
JOSHUA R. BENSON
jbenson@tcolaw.com
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR
JLeeTaylor@mofo.com
RICHARD S.J. HUNG
rhung@mofo.com
WILLIAM F. LEE
william.lee@wilmerhale.com
JASON R. BARTLETT
JasonBartlett@mofo.com
MARK D. SELWYN, ESQ.
mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com
DEOK KEUN MATTHEW AHN
dahn@mofo.com
GRANT L. KIM
gkim@mofo.com
DAVID B. BASSETT
david.bassett@wilmerhale.com
MICHAEL J. BETTINGER
mike.bettinger@klgates.com
ALISON M. TUCHER
atucher@mofo.com
ROBERT DONALD CULTICE
robert.cultice@wilmerhale.com
27
28
02198.51855/4649774.1
STEPHEN E. TAYLOR
MARK D. FLANAGAN
-2-
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE________
1
mark.flanagan@wilmerhale.com
2
ANDREW MONACH
amonach@mofo.com
3
4
BRIAN LARIVEE
brian.larivee@wilmerhale.com
JEREMY WINER
jeremy.winer@wilmerhale.com
ERIK J. OLSON
ejolson@mofo.com
ESTHER KIM
ekim@mofo.com
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
VICTOR F. SOUTO
vic.souto@wilmerhale.com
RICHARD GOLDENBERG
richard.goldenberg@wilmerhale.com
EMILY R. WHELAN
emily.whelan@wilmerhale.com
MICHAEL SAJI
michael.saji@wilmerhale.com
JAMES C. BURLING
james.burling@wilmerhale.com
BRIAN SEEVE
brian.seeve@wilmerhale.com
ROBERT J. GUNTHER, JR.
robert.gunther@wilmerhale.com
12
13
PETER J. KOLOVOS
peter.kolovos@wilmerhale.com
14
15 Executed on June 26, 2012, at San Francisco, California.
16
17
__ /s/ Joby Martin________
JOBY MARTIN
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4649774.1
-2-
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE________
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?