Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1149

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company) re #1147 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Samsung's Motion to Stay June 26, 2012 Preliminary Injunction Pending Appeal (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 6/27/2012)

Download PDF
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)  charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 50 California Street, 22nd Floor  San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600  Facsimile: (415) 875-6700  Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129) kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com  Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603) victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com th  555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5 Floor Redwood Shores, California 94065  Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100  Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)  michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor  Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 443-3000  Facsimile: (213) 443-3100  Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS  AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION  APPLE INC., a California corporation,   CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK Plaintiff, vs. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE  SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG  ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG  TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,  Defendants.     02198.51855/4649774.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE________ 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of 3 eighteen years and not a party to the within action; my business address is 55 California Street, 4 San Francisco, California. 5 On June 27, 2012, I served true copies of the documents described as 6 1. Motion to Stay and Suspend the June 26, 2012 Preliminary Injunction Pending 7 Appeal Or, Alternatively, Pending Decision By Federal Circuit On Stay Pending 8 Appeal. 9 10 by emailing a link to the aforementioned documents to the interested parties in this action as 11 follows: 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Counsel for Apple, Inc. HAROLD J. MCELHINNY HMcElhinny@mofo.com STEPHEN MCG. BUNDY sbundy@tcolaw.com MICHAEL A. JACOBS MJacobs@mofo.com JOSHUA R. BENSON jbenson@tcolaw.com JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR JLeeTaylor@mofo.com RICHARD S.J. HUNG rhung@mofo.com WILLIAM F. LEE william.lee@wilmerhale.com MARK D. SELWYN, ESQ. mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com JASON R. BARTLETT JasonBartlett@mofo.com DAVID B. BASSETT david.bassett@wilmerhale.com DEOK KEUN MATTHEW AHN dahn@mofo.com GRANT L. KIM gkim@mofo.com MICHAEL J. BETTINGER mike.bettinger@klgates.com ROBERT DONALD CULTICE robert.cultice@wilmerhale.com ALISON M. TUCHER atucher@mofo.com MARK D. FLANAGAN mark.flanagan@wilmerhale.com 26 27 STEPHEN E. TAYLOR staylor@tcolaw.com ANDREW MONACH 28 02198.51855/4649774.1 -2- Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE________ 1 amonach@mofo.com brian.larivee@wilmerhale.com 2 ERIK J. OLSON ejolson@mofo.com JEREMY WINER jeremy.winer@wilmerhale.com VICTOR F. SOUTO vic.souto@wilmerhale.com ESTHER KIM ekim@mofo.com EMILY R. WHELAN emily.whelan@wilmerhale.com RICHARD GOLDENBERG richard.goldenberg@wilmerhale.com JAMES C. BURLING james.burling@wilmerhale.com MICHAEL SAJI michael.saji@wilmerhale.com ROBERT J. GUNTHER, JR. robert.gunther@wilmerhale.com BRIAN SEEVE brian.seeve@wilmerhale.com 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 PETER J. KOLOVOS peter.kolovos@wilmerhale.com 12 BRIAN LARIVEE 13 14 Executed on June 27, 2012, at San Francisco, California. 15 16 __ /s/ Joby Martin________ JOBY MARTIN 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 02198.51855/4649774.1 -2- Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE________

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?