Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1214

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Scope of Depositions filed by Apple Inc.. (Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 7/11/2012)

1 HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

[e-mail]
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
[e-mail]
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368)
[e-mail]
ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363)
[e-mail]
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
[e-mail]
JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

10 Attorneys for Plaintiff and
11

Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC.

12

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,
LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
INC. and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN JOSE DIVISION

16
17 APPLE INC., a California corporation,

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)

18

JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SCOPE OF
DEPOSITIONS

Plaintiff,

19
20

v.

21 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
22 AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; and
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
23 AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,
24
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCOPE OF DEPOSITIONS

1 Additional attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC.
2
WILLIAM F. LEE
3 [e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
4 HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
5 Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: [phone]
6 Facsimile: [phone]
7 MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
[e-mail]
8 WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
9 950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
10 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCOPE OF DEPOSITIONS

1

The parties, through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as

2 follows:
3

WHEREAS, Apple Inc. (“Apple”) commenced the above-captioned action (the

4 “Litigation”) against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and
5 Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively “Samsung,” and together with Apple,
6 “the parties” and individually each a “Party”) on April 15, 2011;
7

WHEREAS, on May 17, 2012, the parties each filed a Motion to Strike (Dkt. Nos. 934 and

8 939), seeking to strike and preclude portions of certain expert reports.
9

WHEREAS, on June 27, 2012, the Court issued an Order Granting-in-Part and Denying-

10 in-Part Motion to Strike Expert Reports (Dkt. No. 1144) (“Order”), and ordered that Stephen Gray
11 and Dr. Ravin Balakrishnan sit for an additional two hours of deposition and that Michael Wagner
12 sit for an additional three hours of deposition;
13

WHEREAS, the parties understand that the additional depositions described in the Court’s

14 Order are limited to the topics at issue in the Parties’ Motions to Strike;
15

WHEREAS, the Court’s Order called for the depositions to be completed on or before

16 July 13, 2012;
17

WHEREAS, the parties agree to extend the deadline for completing these three depositions

18 through July 17, 2012 to accommodate the schedules of the experts being deposed, and that such
19 delay will not otherwise impact the schedule or any other deadlines in this Litigation;
20

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties as

21 follows:
22

1.

The deposition of Dr. Ravin Balakrishnan shall be limited in scope to the products

23 considered by him in forming his infringement position regarding U.S. Patent No. 7,469,381;
24

2.

The deposition of Stephen Gray shall be limited in scope to the non-infringement

25 theories and opinions in Mr. Gray’s supplemental expert report and to his examination of accused
26 products relating to the opinions expressed in that supplemental report;
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG
-1)JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCOPE OF DEPOSITIONS

1

3.

The deposition of Michael Wagner shall be limited in scope to three hours on his

2 Supplemental Expert Report and his alternative damages model in Tab 6 of his rebuttal expert
3 report; and
4

4.

The depositions of the aforementioned experts may occur up to, and including,

5 July 17, 2012.
6
7
8
9
10

Dated: July 11, 2012
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

11

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP

12
13 By: Michael A. Jacobs__________
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY
14
MICHAEL A. JACOBS
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR
15
ALISON M. TUCHER
RICHARD S.J. HUNG
16
JASON R. BARTLETT
17
18
19

WILLIAM F. LEE
MARK D. SELWYN
Attorneys for APPLE INC.

By: Victoria F. Maroulis________________
CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN
KEVIN P.B. JOHNSON
VICTORIA F. MAROULIS
EDWARD DEFRANCO
MICHAEL T. ZELLER
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO. LTD, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., AND SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
-2JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCOPE OF DEPOSITIONS

1
2

ATTESTATION
I, Michael A. Jacobs, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this

3 Joint Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Victoria F.
4

Maroulis has concurred in this filing.

5
6
7 Dated: July 10, 2012
8

/s/ Michael A. Jacobs
Michael A. Jacobs

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
-3JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCOPE OF DEPOSITIONS

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

Pursuant to stipulation,

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5 Dated: July
6
7

, 2012
The Honorable Paul S. Grewal
United States Magistrate Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
-4JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCOPE OF DEPOSITIONS