Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 125

STIPULATION AND ORDER re #119 Extending Time for Briefing of Samsung's Motion to Disqualify. Signed by Judge Koh on 7/21/2011. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2011)

HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
1 [e-mail]
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
2 [e-mail]
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
3 [e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
4 425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
5 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
6
KENNETH H. BRIDGES (CA SBN 243541)
7 [e-mail]
MICHAEL T. PIEJA (CA SBN 250351)
8 [e-mail]
BRIDGES & MAVRAKAKIS LLP
9 3000 El Camino Real
One Palo Alto Square, 2nd Floor
10 Palo Alto, CA 94306
Telephone: [phone]
11 Facsimile: [phone]

MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
WILLIAM F. LEE (pro hac vice anticipated)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

12 Attorneys for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.
13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN JOSE DIVISION

17
APPLE INC.,

Case No.: C-11-01846 (LHK)

18
Plaintiff,

JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
EXTENSION OF TIME

19
v.
20

Place: Courtroom 8, 4th Floor
Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
21 Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
22 York corporation; and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
23 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
24

Defendants.

25
26
27
28
1.
Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Extension of Time
Case No. C-11-01846 (LHK)

1

WHEREAS, plaintiff Apple Inc. (“Apple”) filed its Complaint on April 15, 2011, naming

2 as defendants Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung
3 Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively “Samsung”).
4

WHEREAS, on June 16, 2011, counsel Kenneth Harold Bridges and Michael Thomas

5 Pieja of the law firm Bridges & Mavrakakis, LLP filed notices of appearance on behalf of Apple;
6

WHEREAS, on July 11, 2011 defendants filed a Motion to Disqualify the Bridges &

7 Mavrakakis, LLP firm from representing Apple in this litigation, setting the hearing date for
8 August 18, 2011 (“the Motion;” Docket Item No. 101);
9

WHEREAS, on July 19, 2011, this Court continued the hearing on the Motion from

10 August 18, 2011 to August 24, 2011, and issued a Clerk’s Notice resetting deadlines as to the
11 Motion (Docket Item No, 116);
12

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civ. L. R. 7-3(a) the opposition to the Motion is currently due to

13 be filed on or before Monday, July 25, 2011;
14

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civ. L. R. 7-3(c) the reply to any opposition to the Motion is

15 currently due to be filed on or before Monday, August 1, 2011;
16

WHEREAS, Taylor & Company Law Offices, LLP is in the process of being retained to

17 assist the Bridges & Mavrakakis firm with respect to the Motion;
18

WHEREAS, on June 19, 2011 counsel for Samsung agreed to a modification of the

19 parties’ briefing schedule for the Motion;
20

WHEREAS, the new filing dates jointly proposed by counsel for the parties would still

21 give the Court fifteen (15) days before the August 24, 2011 hearing in which to consider all papers
22 on the Motion;
23

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the

24 parties, through their respective counsel, that:
25

(1)

The filing date for the opposition to Samsung’s Motion will be extended to and

26 including August 1, 2011;
27

(2)

The filing date for the reply in support of the Motion will be extended to and

28 including August 8, 2011;
1.
Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Extension of Time
Case No. C-11-01846 (LHK)

1

(3)

Pursuant to the Court’s Notice issued on July 19, 2011, the hearing on the motion

2 to disqualify will take place on August 24, 2011, at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 8 of the above3 captioned Court;
4

(4)

No other dates or deadlines shall be modified by this stipulation and order; and

5

(5)

This extension of time is without prejudice to either Apple or Samsung, and shall

6 not be construed or otherwise used in any way to support a contention of delay, untimeliness, or
7 lack of harm to Apple or Samsung arising from the acts alleged in this action or this motion.
8
9 Dated: July 20, 2011
10 BRIDGES & MAVRAKAKIS, LLP

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP

11
12

By: /s/ Michael T. Pieja
KENNETH H. BRIDGES
13
MICHAEL T. PIEJA
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff
15
APPLE INC.

By: /s/ Victoria Maroulis
CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN
KEVIN P.B. JOHNSON
VICTORIA F. MAROULIS
EDWARD DEFRANCE
MICHAEL T. ZELLER

16

Attorneys for Defendnats SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS CO. LTD, SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
AMERICA, LLC.

17
18
19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22
July 21, 2011
23 DATED: ___________________
24

_______________________________________
HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

25
26
27
28
2.
Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Extension of Time
Case No. C-11-01846 (LHK)