Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1271

OBJECTIONS to re #1243 Notice (Other), Samsung's Discovery Designations by Apple Inc.(a California corporation). (Selwyn, Mark) (Filed on 7/20/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6

HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
[e-mail]
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8
9

WILLIAM F. LEE (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant Apple Inc.

10
11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
vs.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity, SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation, and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Defendants.

24

APPLE INC.’S OBJECTIONS TO
SAMSUNG’S DISCOVERY
DESIGNATIONS

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity, SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation, and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Counterclaim-Plaintiffs,
v.

25

Civil Action No. 11-CV-01846-LHK

APPLE INC., a California corporation,

21
22
23

26

Counterclaim-Defendant.

27
28
APPLE INC.’S OBJECTIONS TO SAMSUNG’S
DISCOVERY DESIGNATIONS
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

1

Pursuant to Section D(3) of Judge Koh’s Jury Pretrial Standing Order, Apple objects to

2

Samsung’s Discovery Designations [Dkt. 1243] as follows: Apple incorporates by reference the

3

general and specific objections listed in the written discovery responses Samsung has designated

4

for use at trial. Apple further objects to the extent Samsung is designating any discovery

5

responses that have since been amended or corrected, or that contain incomplete or inaccurate

6

information. Apple further objects to the extent Samsung’s Discovery Designations include

7

subject matter or evidence that has been excluded by Court order.

8
Dated: July 20, 2012
9
10

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

11
12

By:

13

Attorneys for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.

14
15
16
17

/s/ Michael A. Jacobs
Michael A. Jacobs

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
By:

/s/ Mark D. Selwyn
Mark D. Selwyn

18
19

Attorneys for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-

APPLE INC.’S OBJECTIONS TO SAMSUNG’S
DISCOVERY DESIGNATIONS
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

1
2
3
4
5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has
been served on July 20, 2012 to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to
electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Civil Local Rule 5.4. Any other counsel
of record will be served by electronic mail, facsimile and/or overnight delivery.

6
7

/s/ Mark D. Selwyn
Mark D. Selwyn

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

APPLE INC.’S OBJECTIONS TO SAMSUNG’S
DISCOVERY DESIGNATIONS
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)